Too many cameras in Amateur porn these days

[Rockheart]

Just been noticing that people are just trying to hard to film their amateur porn these days.
Even some of the pros are getting caught up in this.

Some amateur videos I watch both people are trying to record it with a phone and then there is often a web cam set up also.
Even again there will be a fourth camera set up somewhere.

So instead of concentrating on the sex they are adjusting the cameras or lining up the shot or not paying attention.
BORING!
Filming my own weiner is more exciting!

I won't even get into smartphone pictures taken in the mirror.
That is a whole other rant.
Tripods of all sizes are cheap, check the dollar store!
(Better yet, get another person to do it)

[dom r]

That really sounds annoying to watch. We watch porn not for entertainment, we watch porn to GET OFF. We dont want the camera moving and switching often. We want the best camera angle staying still most of the time. And even worse are those edits. Its NOT a special effects movie we're watching.

ANOTHER THING I notice recently in porn is widescreen which cuts off the shemale and female's face and lower butt when their legs are up or spreaded ESPECIALLY 2.35:1. They should keep widescreen for movies not for porn!!!!!!!!!!!

EXAMPLES-heres a widescreen shot where her butt is completely cut off in order to get a decent zoom-IT MAKES ME WONDER, IS IT widescreen or NARROW screen?-It doesnt take a genius to figure out widescreen zoom cuts out the face or butt and in order to get the full picture in widescreen she will appear too far away-


Compare that to this fullscreen shot. Her face and butt(and cun of course) is completely in the zoom and not cut out because of the square screen.This scene is definately a big orgasm giver. From Sister Snatch dvd, a must.-

Heres another example of how fullscreen includes her face and complete butt.If this was the same widescreen as the first example her face or butt would be cut out compleley and in order to get this exact camera angle and complete picture of her in 2.35:1 widescreen she would appear too far away meaning no more complete close up of this and the other money shot sample.-From Mackenzie Law dvd # 621, playtimevideo.


and yet another example. You put a 2.35:1 widescreen on this exact picture and the top or bottom would be cut out- from playtimevideo dvd # 1599- mmmm let your nose and tongue do the walking all over that-


and yet again look how fullscreen captures it all-from Shannon 2 dvd, pantiesism.com.


ok heres an example of how 2.35:1 almost will work in this case(or I think im wrong since most of her face still would not be seen to include that butt with cunt) and you cant see any of her stomach or tits due to the very low camera angle and her position.In fact alot of new porn with 2:35.1 screen shows alot of these types of extremely low angles where you cant see any of their stomach and tits, its like you only see butt cun and face and thats it so it kind of misses out on the better full picture angles as I shown.
-from playtimevideo dvd #735-
this segment on 15 sec repeat gives me a huge orgasm, in fact they all do on this post-


mmmm slide yur dick up and down on that on the outside where all the wet fun is.

--------------sorry I didnt include any examples of shemales although she is pretending to wank off her dick.
OK im done with the many edits.....actually i did 3 more.

[mand]

you got to much time on your hands dom,one thing i have noticed is that some new vids of black tgirls are smokin hot

[Alexis]

I'm totally amateur..

I have a couple cameras, tripod, monopod, lights..

I still pull off some stellar self pics with the cellphone tho..

Even some good mirror shots now and then..

For web casting and online sessions I have a full HD camera on a tripod..

I also have full pan tilt and 20X optical zoom on a remote..

[dom r]

you got to much time on your hands dom,one thing i have noticed is that some new vids of black tgirls are smokin hot

but the new dvds that feature 2.35:1 widescreen is not really good for porn because of the top and bottom being cut off during close ups. I always knew fullscreen was always bigger than widescreen. I bet in future fullscreen tvs will come back. A square is always larger than a rectangle.

And wow,this and that other avatar pic before this one of you with a cigarette are 20 out of 10.