80% 20% Rule

[bluequad]

I've read a lot about the 80% 20% Rule regarding not so great providers and great providers. So who is on your 20% list and why did they make the A-list? There are currently 160 ads with pictures in the Toronto section so there should be a lot of providers that are in the 20%.

[toban]

80/20 A good concept to work with

I've read a lot about the 80% 20% Rule regarding not so great providers and great providers. So who is on your 20% list and why did they make the A-list? There are currently 160 ads with pictures in the Toronto section so there should be a lot of providers that are in the 20%.

I?d never heard of this concept as a ?rule? before, but on Googling 80:20 I see that it is a well established concept in the business community.

While I must wait and plan for months before flying to visit Toronto, the TGirl Mecca, in anticipation of that visit I generally rank my choices from ?Have to see? down to ?Only if desperate?. In an old list I was able to dig up, the split didn?t work out to a neat 80:20 ratio but was pretty darned close @ 32:9 so essentially without even being aware of the 80:20 rule I have been using it all along!

Now Sir, for fear they get all used up before I get back to Mecca once more, I shall not publicly divulge my nine number one choices here.

[Ray]

I used to be a wedding photographer and the 80/20 - 20/80 rule meant that on the original package sold, 80% was cost or expense and 20% was profit. On any reorders after the wedding, 20% was expense and 80% was profit. I think this is what Mr. Toban was referring to.

[toban]

I used to be a wedding photographer and the 80/20 - 20/80 rule meant that on the original package sold, 80% was cost or expense and 20% was profit. On any reorders after the wedding, 20% was expense and 80% was profit. I think this is what Mr. Toban was referring to.

Well Ray, while as an entrepreneur, you are referring to your profit in a monetary sense, that’s not the terminology I would be using but I consider my top choices i.e. those girls in the top 20% grouping on my todo list, as those I consider most capable of providing me the best chance of realizing a reasonable “payback” or “payoff” for my time and $$$! So then yes, I suppose my payoff could be comparable to your profit.

Interestingly too, is that when we have discovered a girl that we have really clicked with on a higher than normal level, and a repeat visit has been arranged for, that new visit could be comparable in a way to your more profitable “re-orders” because almost certainly, as many of us here have experienced during such subsequent visits, the satisfaction or “payoff” level will turn out to be even greater than that which we experienced during the original visit! More satisfaction is equivalent to more profit!

One difference though is that as a businessman your profit is tangible while in my case the payoff could be unpredictable, even illusory but .

[Shyla Wild]

I think the OP is asking who are the 20% of the 160 girls on Shemale that are worth seeing. Basically he is asking who are these top girls...and why.

So, 20% of 160 girls means there is about 32 girls that make this list....discuss.

[candyhilton]

it would be awsome if shemalecanada had a TOP RATED list as (based on a most frequently visited by unique IP address's... that way X girl cant make herself #1 by clicking on her page 1000 times a day).

and that way it would rate all the girls on the homepage... how wonderful would that be

LET THE PUBLIC SPEAK for itself!
lol I'm somewhere near the bottom but hey thats OK!

[bluequad]

That's exactly what I meant Shyla. Everyone will have a slightly different view because everyone likes something different but for the most part, the list should be pretty much the same. I just read a lot about "stick to the 20% and you'll be fine" but no one says who the 20% includes!

Candy, you don't give yourself enough credit and you would be nowhere near the bottom of thelist, I'm sure.

[Shyla Wild]

it would be awsome if shemalecanada had a TOP RATED list as (based on a most frequently visited by unique IP address's... that way X girl cant make herself #1 by clicking on her page 1000 times a day).

and that way it would rate all the girls on the homepage... how wonderful would that be

LET THE PUBLIC SPEAK for itself!
lol I'm somewhere near the bottom but hey thats OK!

I disagree. This type of thing would ensure that girls starting out would get pushed out. The great thing about SMC is that we are all on equal playing fields. The system almost forces the client to go through all the pages to find someone. And unlike backpage, it does not have an option to bump our ads to the top by paying. This is good because the girls with money, would quickly buy up the top advertising spots. Just like we did once the banners became available.

We are all on the same equal playing field, with only our talents and profiles to get us by on SMC.

[toban]

No single, reasonably compact top list could ever be produced!

I think the OP is asking who are the 20% of the 160 girls on Shemale that are worth seeing. Basically he is asking who are these top girls...and why.

So, 20% of 160 girls means there is about 32 girls that make this list....discuss.

That's exactly what I meant Shyla. [COLOR="#FF0000"]Everyone will have a slightly different view because everyone likes something different[/COLOR] but for the most part, the list should be pretty much the same. I just read a lot about "stick to the 20% and you'll be fine" but no one says who the 20% includes!

I have to agree with Shyla that it is absolutely impossible to produce a valid list of the top 20% escorts! Bluequad is correct too by pointing out that everyone has a slightly different view so how could a common list of the top 20% ever be produced?

As bluequad points out, all these different views each of us here has, along with each of our own wants and foibles, would mean that any list would have to contain countless names of girls capable of satisfying that great multitude of wants and foibles harboured by the 10’s of thousands of guys on here. For that same reason I am quite convinced that there is no one girl or even a short list of maybe 20 girls who every guy on this forum would agree is “the best“ and would be qualified be on that list.

No single, reasonably compact list of the best girls could ever be produced!

It is up to each enthusiast to educate himself by using the resources available to him here and elsewhere to develop and maintain his own list of girls he would prefer to spend time with.

[Photo Mann]

In agreement . . .

I disagree. This type of thing would ensure that girls starting out would get pushed out. The great thing about SMC is that we are all on equal playing fields. The system almost forces the client to go through all the pages to find someone. And unlike backpage, it does not have an option to bump our ads to the top by paying. This is good because the girls with money, would quickly buy up the top advertising spots. Just like we did once the banners became available.

We are all on the same equal playing field, with only our talents and profiles to get us by on SMC.

I agree with the level playing field idea. If a lady is professional and provides above average service, then her individual wealth at that time should not be a determining factor in whether or not she gets equal exposure. If someone is above average, then they should be rewarded in commensurate fashion. Also, the competition that results can only improve the average level of service among the group. New ladies want to do well and make a name for themselves. Established ladies want to remain, and continue what they have built. Different motivations resulting in the same end, hopefully. Improved service.

[xoxJanexox]

it would be awsome if shemalecanada had a TOP RATED list as (based on a most frequently visited by unique IP address's... that way X girl cant make herself #1 by clicking on her page 1000 times a day).

and that way it would rate all the girls on the homepage... how wonderful would that be

LET THE PUBLIC SPEAK for itself!
lol I'm somewhere near the bottom but hey thats OK!

Trust me sweetheart, the IP address trick is an old one. I can see recently an army of "worriers" invading the forum akin to Ford's nation!

I disagree. This type of thing would ensure that girls starting out would get pushed out. The great thing about SMC is that we are all on equal playing fields. The system almost forces the client to go through all the pages to find someone. And unlike backpage, it does not have an option to bump our ads to the top by paying. This is good because the girls with money, would quickly buy up the top advertising spots. Just like we did once the banners became available.

We are all on the same equal playing field, with only our talents and profiles to get us by on SMC.

My respect for this stand. It is inspiring that it comes from someone established like you.

[bluequad]

Of course, there is no definitive list of the top 20% but yet you read people on this forum saying to others to stick to the well reviewed, the ones that always provide great experiences, use the top 20% rule etc. I think anyone who has been on this site for a long time would agree that this place isn't what it used to be. There aren't nearly the number of girls that participate on here that there used to be. I suppose facebook, twitter and other social media outlets are partly to blame for the lack of participation. The Tgirl Chat section used to be the place where people asked questions and had them answered or there were threads about a current topic that many people provided opinions on. If you look through the threads now, many are related to picture posting of girls with big cocks or tits or butts. There is a section dedicated for that called "Shemale Pictures and Movies". Then go look at the review section. For every valid review thread, there are numerous, "any info on this girl" threads. That's not a review, that's a question! There are also several reviews from people with only a couple of posts. They have not participated in any other discussions so they are seen as fake reviews. I'm sure that some are fake and some are legitimate but how would anyone know for sure? When someone comes to this site looking for information about a specific girl or girls and they see things like this, they have to scratch their heads. Mr. Toban, I agree with you that in years gone by, you could educate yourself on who to see based on information found on this site quite easily but now it's nearly impossible. I can go through all the ads on SMC and out of the 160 ads with pictures and information find plenty of information about a few of the girls (mostly older information) but the rest there is little or no information about them. Mr. Toban, you yourself have answered people looking for information and said that you saw that girl in the past, wrote a review and you can't find it now. So if you can't find your own review, how is anyone else supposed to educate themselves based on your experiences? Another example of how this site isn't what it used to be is this thread. If I would have posted this thread 5 years ago, it would be several pages long with guys posting who their favorite girls are. Everyone's list would be a little different and there would have been discussion on some of the girls and agreement or disagreement about others. There isn't one entry like that. Why did this site change so much? Is social media to blame? Is all of the fighting between some of the girls that used to happen (and still does from time to time) to blame? The changes that have occurred got rid of some of the bad element that used to be the norm on here and that's a good thing but it also severely hurt everyone's ability to be educated on who to see and who to stay away from too. That's why I posted this thread in the first place. I was hoping to spark some interest in creating dialogue and education about the girls and who everyone liked but I suppose once that aspect of the site has died, there's no reviving it.

[candyhilton]

I do think the "stick to the 20% and u'll be fine" comment is such a bloody insult to everyone that dosent fall into the impossible-to-look-like-Ana-Mancini category.

[Crystalsopen]

Any competitive industry already pushes people out

I've read a lot about the 80% 20% Rule regarding not so great providers and great providers. So who is on your 20% list and why did they make the A-list? There are currently 160 ads with pictures in the Toronto section so there should be a lot of providers that are in the 20%.

My humble opinion is the smartest people look for quality and ask "is it worth it to me" in ANYTHING (goods or services) they are paying for. They don't get obsessed with "best of breed", "top 20%", "A-list" or whatever buzz word people like at the moment.

[one-eyed-milkman]

SheMale Canada Listing

I would like to add that I have noticed a number of ladies on SMC who appear on the pages everyday but they don't seem to exist......there are no reviews here on them either.


just my 2? worth