If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I think it's the stockings that give it away. Look closely and the meshing does not match. On the legs, the holes are bigger but it is a different size on the hip and crotch. Just a theory.
I think it's the stockings that give it away. Look closely and the meshing does not match. On the legs, the holes are bigger but it is a different size on the hip and crotch. Just a theory.
I can't agree that this is a photoshopped pic of a GG for two reasons.
The mesh of the panties does not conform to the legs because with a mesh that large in the panty, it would be near impossible to keep "things" from falling out through the large gaps in the mesh. Also, if the pic is enlarged enough it is evident, to me anyway, that there is a definite seam where the legs and panty are joined together. I say it is a one piece garment.
Secondly, the breast implants are very poorly shaped (like two grapefruit halves) which no GG would need or ever accept. They are definite bolt-ons and not convincing at all!
The pic is marked as property of W4B (Watch4Beauty). That is an erotic art magazine. No where in the magazines listings does it indicate any use of transsexual models.
Sorry, photoshopped until proven otherwise
Is that a cock in your panties, or am I about to get slapped in the face?
The pic is marked as property of W4B (Watch4Beauty). That is an erotic art magazine. No where in the magazines listings does it indicate any use of transsexual models.
Sorry, photoshopped until proven otherwise
Sorry, can't accept that excuse!
Why in the world would an erotic art magazine state on their site that they did or did not use transexual models or photoshop any pics therein? Art is produced by any means and whether it is art depends solely on the viewers perception, not the method of creation.
Actually if you check around I am sure that almost every publication, especially all the erotic ones, regularly use photoshopped pics. I know only of one that acknowledges that they do not, i.e. National Geographic!
I'll have to admit that those four pics posted by ATM say a whole lot more than I did, but in the end and despite those 400o words they say, how can we be sure that even they were not photoshopped to remove that monster dick?
Comment