No more SMC profile photo verification?

[tao1kiku]

I'm one of the people who helps out with doing Shemalecanada profile photo verification services. When Rockheart owned and ran SMC, this service was quick and easy, providing an assurance that the photos in the ads (for those who paid for this service) were accurate.

Since SMC was sold to another company, I've had two providers contact me requesting to have their profile photos verified. However, after trying to contact the SMC admin four times, I've had no response.

What greatly concerns me is that if SMC is no longer doing profile verification, it brings SMC down to the level of ******* and other similar sites.

If there are no more verifications, while the profiles that have been verified are still valid, it doesn't allow any other providers to give the assurance to potential customers that they are legitimate.

I do hope this is not the case. I've always felt SMC was a cut above any other site for provider advertising becuase the photos can be verified.

[Ana_Jolie]

I have had luck with contacting the owner through WhatsApp. Maybe you could try that? I mean like who is going to say no to more money lol

[tao1kiku]

If you could PM me the contact info that would be appreciated!

[justvisiting2016]

A lot more fakes get through on SMC and take longer to get deleted. Whomever is running the site now clearly bought it for the existing affiliate and ad revenues and is doing the bare minimum to keep it running. I would suspect SMC could be come LL as you fear if they don't pay attention.

It's still a solid site for sure; but less attention leads to more problems.

And hey, if a valued and highly trusted person who verifies women in person to verify their photos, can't get a hold of anyone.... that gives a good indicator of where the owners are at as far as how it's viewed.

Personal project from someone gets different attention than a larger business that got it for the traffic and revenues

[drigger]

I'd assume both were good investments from the buyers position. Rockheart wanted out

[drigger]

I'd assume both were good investments from the buyers position. Rockheart wanted out

[ladyluv]

Well, I can say, some of the photo verifications in the past were heavily exaggerated IMO. Get to a provider and they look almost nothing like their photos.

[justvisiting2016]

I'd assume both were good investments from the buyers position. Rockheart wanted out

I would love to know what he got for it. He had a lot of sites with a fair amount of traffic and affiliate links; that he built up for a long time.

[drigger]

I would love to know what he got for it. He had a lot of sites with a fair amount of traffic and affiliate links; that he built up for a long time.

Why would you care to know? I don't see how anyone could possibly relate. My guess...? 1B

[Photo Mann]

I think the best type of photo verification is common sense. I think photo verification is useful sometimes, but as with many things, it is not fool proof, and is only as good as those who do the verification. I agree that some of the photo verifications on SMC have been exaggerated. I really think the change will have a negligible affect on the site, and the playing field. Most people know when they see BS, let's be honest.