Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cock pics

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cock pics

    Why can't we normalize cock pics in the girls' ads? A lot of them advertise as tops with x-large tools, but don't show, and all we have is the word from other clients.

    Oftentimes, they say it is big when it is far from that, or the person's experience differs from the rest. Like some folks reviewed a girl and said it was thick, so I went to check it myself, but it wasn't all that. This is frustrating.

    Whenever I decide to hire a SP, I wanna know where I am getting into, and this includes reviews, untouched pictures, and I wanna see their dicks, especially when they say it is big.

  • #2
    Originally posted by tracebanana View Post
    Why can't we normalize cock pics in the girls' ads? A lot of them advertise as tops with x-large tools, but don't show, and all we have is the word from other clients.

    Oftentimes, they say it is big when it is far from that, or the person's experience differs from the rest. Like some folks reviewed a girl and said it was thick, so I went to check it myself, but it wasn't all that. This is frustrating.

    Whenever I decide to hire a SP, I wanna know where I am getting into, and this includes reviews, untouched pictures, and I wanna see their dicks, especially when they say it is big.
    Preach.

    I've said the same thing many times. It should be a requirement if you want to label it Large/XL. As Missy Elliott once said, "If you've got a big $#%, let me search ya. To find out how hard I gotta work ya."

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree. I'm looking for a good looking penis and above average to large size. The looks is as important as size to me, and I'll take a smaller one to an odd looking big one. To each his own, but is only fare to have the option to choose on what you see, rather on what someone tries to sell you by what they claim.

      Comment


      • #4

        A picture can give a general idea, but it doesn’t compare to seeing it in person. Height and proportions aren’t always visible. My dick can look small on my body in photos, but in real life it’s a different story.

        For some providers, full-body pictures online aren’t an option. And let’s be real — a lot of men jerk off to our photos for free with no intention of booking. That adds up.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Tsema View Post
          A picture can give a general idea, but it doesn’t compare to seeing it in person. Height and proportions aren’t always visible. My dick can look small on my body in photos, but in real life it’s a different story.

          For some providers, full-body pictures online aren’t an option. And let’s be real — a lot of men jerk off to our photos for free with no intention of booking. That adds up.
          I agree that perspective helps, but being able to see the goods and make a judgment call also helps many of us book.

          And while it's true a lot of men will jerk off to the pics, they are going to do it anyways, so why not let it be your pics? At least then you are on their minds and probably a better chance of booking a session in the future...

          Comment


          • #6

            "And while it's true a lot of men will jerk off to the pics, they are going to do it anyways, so why not let it be your pics? At least then you are on their minds and probably a better chance of booking a session in the future..."
            So true. Ive done that myself and ended up booking quite a few times with those girls, some of them became my go to girl because of it.

            Comment


            • #7
              Advertising, regardless if the industry, is inherently misleading to begin with. Add to that, that everyone with a wide angle lens and the proper aspect ratio, can make a Vienna sausage look like a Porchetta roll. Also, there are so many dick pics to choose form (stolen) on the internet, that many have simply borrowed someone else's dick for their ad. Then there's simple stats . . . large members are hard to cum by. If you happen to find one, it's like finding a unicorn . . . in a hay stack . . . on Mars . . . during Lunar New Year. I would like to see more 'trans'parent ads, however, that will also come with far more deception in the advertising of said penises. Having said that, there is a relatively new SP in North York who advertises on and off, showing a huge pipe in her photos. BBC for those who are so inclined. It will be interesting to see if any credible information has been gathered about this trouser snake, by other forum members.
              "Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win." - SUN TZU

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Tsema View Post
                And let’s be real — a lot of men jerk off to our photos for free with no intention of booking. That adds up.
                Some of us do both! 😋

                Comment


                • #9
                  Clicking on this was disappointing tbh

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by tracebanana View Post
                    Why can't we normalize cock pics in the girls' ads? A lot of them advertise as tops with x-large tools, but don't show, and all we have is the word from other clients.

                    Oftentimes, they say it is big when it is far from that, or the person's experience differs from the rest. Like some folks reviewed a girl and said it was thick, so I went to check it myself, but it wasn't all that. This is frustrating.

                    Whenever I decide to hire a SP, I wanna know where I am getting into, and this includes reviews, untouched pictures, and I wanna see their dicks, especially when they say it is big.
                    With AI these days, and we've already seen it this argument is moot. Hence this forum.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      You are mixing things here. All we want is more transparency like mentioned above . Despite Ema's points - which are valid BTW- her ad is perfect for this purpose, so people can have their own conclusions.
                      Talk about AI or not bringing some topics to the table, only maintains the status quo.
                      See, this makes everything better, not only for us clients, but for the SPs as well. Of course, this is ultimately the girls choice, but a valid discussion.
                      Moreover, I am not Canadian and most of my sexlife was in South America. You may have seen this argument and came to an agreement with yourself. However, I saw different scenarios, had different experiences, and honestly, i find the Toronto's SP scene pretty sad. Looks like the Montreal one is better.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'm just saying clicking on this I was hoping for some pretty girl cock pix.

                        But bro. Since AI became a thing. You could put a twelve in incher on Sydney Sweeney. It dosent matter anymore


                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Studly34 View Post
                          I'm just saying clicking on this I was hoping for some pretty girl cock pix.

                          But bro. Since AI became a thing. You could put a twelve in incher on Sydney Sweeney. It dosent matter anymore

                          Fine but show me anyway. Make me be a detective about it at least. No cock pic but claiming huge is a red flag (esp if you don't have many 'good' reviews or are 'new'). I'd actually be fine with a trade off with face-out pics. If you're not comfortable with showing your face you can at least give us cock-out pics and I can determine whether you've actually got the tools to get the job done.

                          Comment



                          Working...
                          X