If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
What's the problem with saying it's a bunch of TVs not TGs? I think that, despite what some on this board would have to say on the matter, that the average TG fancier has a pretty clear idea of the distinction: a TG is either on hormones or has implants. A TV may well intend to BECOME a TG, but ain't one yet. That would certainly be the common understanding, I think.
I know, I know: all those folks who fancy the "flatter chested TGirls" and all those "flatter chested TGirls" themselves are gonna jump all over me for this one, but it is my opinion. Some of you may not share it, but...
I'm even willing to admit that it may reflect my personal preferences (i.e. TGs who look just like GGs with a "little" something extra), but I do think it's the common understanding of distinction between the terms, too.
What's the problem with saying it's a bunch of TVs not TGs? I think that, despite what some on this board would have to say on the matter, that the average TG fancier has a pretty clear idea of the distinction: a TG is either on hormones or has implants. A TV may well intend to BECOME a TG, but ain't one yet. That would certainly be the common understanding, I think.Â
I know, I know: all those folks who fancy the "flatter chested TGirls" and all those "flatter chested TGirls" themselves are gonna jump all over me for this one, but it is my opinion. Some of you may not share it, but...
I'm even willing to admit that it may reflect my personal preferences (i.e. TGs who look just like GGs with a "little" something extra), but I do think it's the common understanding of distinction between the terms, too.
What's the problem with saying it's a bunch of TVs not TGs? Â I think that, despite what some on this board would have to say on the matter, that the average TG fancier has a pretty clear idea of the distinction: a TG is either on hormones or has implants. Â A TV may well intend to BECOME a TG, but ain't one yet. Â That would certainly be the common understanding, I think. Â
I know, I know: all those folks who fancy the "flatter chested TGirls" and all those "flatter chested TGirls" themselves are gonna jump all over me for this one, but it is my opinion. Â Some of you may not share it, but...
I'm even willing to admit that it may reflect my personal preferences (i.e. TGs who look just like GGs with a "little" something extra), but I do think it's the common understanding of distinction between the terms, too.
FYI - The term TG ( transgendered ) refers to all catagories of transpeople. I believe the intent was to show the distiction between TS ( transsexuals) and other kinds of TG (transgendered) people.
For the record I am not TG (transgendered) I am self identified female ( there you go, another catagory to deal with guys  lmfao ), but if you must,.......... call me TS or even shemale, but never TG !
Get your "T's" right or else you may be disappointed.
Shelby
wosh! ts tg tv it's really kind of confusing, we're all different, maybe we should start categorizing the men too. We all have the right to be what ever we chose to be and it's always unique in some way. That's why we can accept these ladies for what they believe themselves to be. An artifical chest won't change much. But to take shots at different preferences sort of defeats the purpose of this forum, don't you think?
What's the problem with saying it's a bunch of TVs not TGs? I think that, despite what some on this board would have to say on the matter, that the average TG fancier has a pretty clear idea of the distinction: a TG is either on hormones or has implants. A TV may well intend to BECOME a TG, but ain't one yet. That would certainly be the common understanding, I think.Â
I know, I know: all those folks who fancy the "flatter chested TGirls" and all those "flatter chested TGirls" themselves are gonna jump all over me for this one, but it is my opinion. Some of you may not share it, but...
I'm even willing to admit that it may reflect my personal preferences (i.e. TGs who look just like GGs with a "little" something extra), but I do think it's the common understanding of distinction between the terms, too.
hi yu, it really is amazing how we can get hung up on something so simple as words, if the lady turns you on thats all there is to it and to me that seems simple enough Curious
Totally agree Smoosh....and it is even coherent for a change..just pullin ur chain Curious..i like your posts.
lol he is interesting to read isn't he? don't worry curious, i've been reading your posts for so long now that i actually think i understand them.... carry on buddy
Comment