Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Review of Ange

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Review of Ange

    Originally posted by curious
    hi yu well inspector clouseau i hopw thats a rap please Curious
    At what point did you become interested in this thread and, in particular the point behind your inquiry ? I'm just curious.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Review of Ange

      hi yu i read everything and enough is enough chow Curious

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Review of Ange

        I'm not entering into a needless continuance of this subject. But in fairness to its importance I felt obliged
        to be a damn sight clearer in this response then written previously by me. Now it's enough !

        In future ............. we'll let that pass for the present.




        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Review of Ange

          Easy there Matlock
          This is not peoples court you know Judge Wapner
          If you don't like what you have just read in their posts thats fine
          but to start pointing the finger and using up our alloted Legalize for the week,
          is stepping out of line. You where not there and taking what the two have posted
          for fact and basing your opinion on a couple of blind post is a dangerous move.
          next time just post the fact that you don't like what you've just read
          this could be done in a general way without naming their names
          something like Hey! note to all this type of thing is illegal and could get you in a shit load of trouble

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Review of Ange

            You remembered the BEAN STOCK handle -Obviously didn't sit well with you - maybe you'll be a little m0re considerate in the future.

            As for your latest piece of advise ? Just stay on your side of correctness and I'll remain in mine.+

            Now I'm really trying to be calm and polite. I don't want to lessen you opinions or expand on them. I just read them.

            So lets not get personal and remember respect goes a lot further then pointless conjecture !

            OK Bean ??

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Review of Ange

              First let me say that what I read in that first review didn't sit well with me
              but perhaps you should read your post be for sending them out
              " Let's not personal " Thats my whole point your post 6 up is full of names
              You based a legal case on what you read in two posts, on a web forum no less
              this is not a chat room so the only legal case you could use a forum post for is one of Slander
              you have every right to be digested with what he wrote, as should we all
              But and this is a BIG but just course he wrote it doesn't make it fact

              about the bean stock thing I thought it was good
              at lest it wasn't string bean

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Review of Ange

                Bean -at the risk of being incorrect- do you really care one iota, how I have covered this thread ,or, are you simply trying to make idle verse ?

                If you and I go on to belabour our perceptions of the dotted "eyes' or crossed 'tees' in each of our printed opinions ,don't we eventually
                exhaust ourselves into literary foolishness.

                I've covered the subject from my perspective ,rightly I claim. But you and others may differ with me, and you most certainly have.

                Now I intend it should lie dormant and end up in the forum achieves. I would hope you too will exercise a prudent withdrawal from the subject.

                That my friend is a closing comment in this regard.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Review of Ange

                  hi yu yup Curious

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Review of Ange

                    I can only tell you my expirience ; which was so good with her for the few times I been. She is always very nice and sexy. Althogh she always goes to the bedroom and goes to bussiness right a way, she has been on her own every time i was there.

                    Another thing is that she is not 4" ; in my opinion and felling, she is at list 6 and hard on every time. she is good being top and really good for bottom .

                    She gives the best bj i have felt and shew loves to do it!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Review of Ange

                      Thought I'd add my 2¢ as well - I pretty much agree with everything totoljc has to say.
                      I've only seen Angee once but I had a good time. You're right about the size (6") and does get hard. You can see from her photos she's flat right now, when she does get enhanced I think she'll be amazing. She's not as enthusiastic as Lucy/Monique/Tia (no kissing for example) but I'm really into that petite thin body type so I have to say I was totally turned on. I plan to repeat next time I get a chance.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Review of Ange

                        Originally posted by totoljc
                        I can only tell you my expirience ; which was so good with her for the few times I been. She is always very nice and sexy. Althogh she always goes to the bedroom and goes to bussiness right a way, she has been on her own every time i was there.

                        Another thing is that she is not 4" ; in my opinion and felling, she is at list 6 and hard on every time. she is good being top and really good for bottom .

                        She gives the best bj i have felt and shew loves to do it!
                        Im not pretty sure who u r. But thnx u for ur words and hope u still enjoy the time we spent together. It would be great to see u again and have a great day, sweetie..........Angee

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Review of Ange

                          Originally posted by lucasboi
                          Thought I'd add my 2¢ as well - I pretty much agree with everything totoljc has to say.
                          I've only seen Angee once but I had a good time. You're right about the size (6") and does get hard. You can see from her photos she's flat right now, when she does get enhanced I think she'll be amazing. She's not as enthusiastic as Lucy/Monique/Tia (no kissing for example) but I'm really into that petite thin body type so I have to say I was totally turned on. I plan to repeat next time I get a chance.
                          Hi, lucasboi. thnx u for ur review. I think it was very sweet and honestly appreciate it..................muaw...Angee

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Review of Ange

                            I've been away for awhile, my apologies for getting everyone upset about this. Just goes to show you that everyone has a diferent opinion of the escorts we meet. Please note that I only noticed the details of the third person after it was over. I've had a few occasions where an escort has a room mate in another room. I didn't think to question it. And after the distance I travel to get laid, having a person in the other room won't stop me, unless of course they are minors. No worries markerverse or smarkerverse, won't happen again. From now on I'll ask, are you versatile and do you have any kids on the apartment? LOL.

                            Sorry Angee, hate to bring you down but I hope it also woke you up. Only you and I know the truth. Oh and just so you know, I'm only 5" (I always say 6) and I was way bigger than you. I think everyone that says she is bigger should remeasure their equipment to use as a guidline.

                            I have to admit that after the assault on me from this review, i am hesitant to tell you all about my threesome with Lucy and Suzy. (Suzy-now that was a weapon) Maybe if you ask nice.

                            KC

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Review of Ange

                              True or not, KC's review has made sure I never visit Angee. No point in taking that type of risk!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Review of Ange

                                Originally posted by KCinToronto
                                I've been away for awhile, my apologies for getting everyone upset about this. Just goes to show you that everyone has a diferent opinion of the escorts we meet. Please note that I only noticed the details of the third person after it was over. I've had a few occasions where an escort has a room mate in another room. I didn't think to question it. And after the distance I travel to get laid, having a person in the other room won't stop me, unless of course they are minors. No worries markerverse or smarkerverse, won't happen again. From now on I'll ask, are you versatile and do you have any kids on the apartment? LOL.

                                Sorry Angee, hate to bring you down but I hope it also woke you up. Only you and I know the truth. Oh and just so you know, I'm only 5" (I always say 6) and I was way bigger than you. I think everyone that says she is bigger should remeasure their equipment to use as a guidline.

                                I have to admit that after the assault on me from this review, i am hesitant to tell you all about my threesome with Lucy and Suzy. (Suzy-now that was a weapon) Maybe if you ask nice.

                                KC
                                hi yu so yu owe us a review pritty please Curious

                                Comment



                                Working...