Tweet
Re: Kim
Sure. From personal experience, I believe Animuszaphodius's post of Kim to be an accurate representation. Honestly, I didn't feel it necessary a few posts back to mention it, but rather just leave it to the readers to establish their own opinion. You made a decision to defend Kim while admitting you hadn't met her. IMO you weren't being accurate, instead chose your stance for a TGIRL.
And ya, it's been mentioned to death here already (acknowledging responsibility for it too) but I feel it's important to voice that escorts should expect to receive reviews for the service they charge, both positive and critical. As client, why wouldn't I be interested in knowing whether an escort's personality is lacking before committing to an appointment? Knowing this saves both parties from wasted time.
The problem, I believe, is that others have trouble separating professional comments from personal ones.
Originally posted by markerverse
Redundancy - Your #29
Quoting me for what purpose one asks ?
Unless of course it was a gracious effort on your part, to avoid twisting anyone's nose out of joint. Patronizing of sorts.
Perhaps you would care to indulge me .
Quoting me for what purpose one asks ?
Unless of course it was a gracious effort on your part, to avoid twisting anyone's nose out of joint. Patronizing of sorts.
Perhaps you would care to indulge me .
And ya, it's been mentioned to death here already (acknowledging responsibility for it too) but I feel it's important to voice that escorts should expect to receive reviews for the service they charge, both positive and critical. As client, why wouldn't I be interested in knowing whether an escort's personality is lacking before committing to an appointment? Knowing this saves both parties from wasted time.
The problem, I believe, is that others have trouble separating professional comments from personal ones.
i am not gay. i am not gay. i am not gay. i am not gay. :-[<br /><br />
Comment