Why would members of this forum want to discourage people...

[Rockheart]

There is really no reason to do anything. Most people can read between the lines. Here is the danger of writing fake reviews on yourself. You better be able to back up what you write about yourself. I have seen a few girls that have these amazing 10s reviews from first time posters or posters with low post counts.....then they get one from a senior member that is nothing like the rest..."The Shill is up". Fake good reviews can be as bad as a bad review and counterproductive.

Have fun. Don't believe everything you read on the internet, learn to think for yourself and you will be fine.

Shyla

You are right usually the fakes will become obvious after a time.
The fakers will only cover their footsteps a short time then think nobody is noticing.

[xoxJanexox]

You are right usually the fakes will become obvious after a time.
The fakers will only cover their footsteps a short time then think nobody is noticing.

Bingo!

[TSFantasia]

You are only using one definition of the word and ignoring any non-extreme meanings.

Coercion can and does me in this sense that the person did not put a review of their own free will.
They may have been asked nicely (coerced) or ordered to make a review (coerced).
If they were given a discount or extra service in exchange for giving a review (coerced)
They were harangued until they gave a review (coerced)
It was suggested it be a good idea and helpful to the person to put a review (coerced.)
You really really really want them to put a review (coerced)
You won't see them again if they don't put a review (coerced)
That bitch Stella is going to beat me if you don't put a review (coerced)
"If you love me you will put a review" (coerced)
Put a review or my boyfriend will kick your ass (coerced)
I'll go out for dinner with you if you put a review (coerced)
I'll marry you if you put up a good review of me (coerced)
I'll pay you if you put up a good review of me (coerced)
My friend will sleep with you if you put up a good review (coerced)
Coerced means convinced in some ways, not necessarily always by evil or illegal tactics.

The fact is if a client is not going to put a review on their own and you insist or ask them to do, it is partly coerced.

Not saying there is anything specifically wrong with it as all businesses would ask for a review generally.
It is in the situation where one's arm is twisted or manipulation is in play, which could be considered coerced.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5rJ4g9EMUk

There is really no reason to do anything. Most people can read between the lines. Here is the danger of writing fake reviews on yourself. You better be able to back up what you write about yourself. I have seen a few girls that have these amazing 10s reviews from first time posters or posters with low post counts.....then they get one from a senior member that is nothing like the rest..."The Shill is up". Fake good reviews can be as bad as a bad review and counterproductive.

As for asking for reviews....I tell people "If they are happy, they are welcome to review me." Word of mouth is a powerful tool, but I also ask members who are not active NOT to review me. I do not want the headaches. The rest of you girls that ask guys not only to sign up, but they sign up from your computers never to be seen again, are just plain asking for it and crying about it serves no purpose. Anything public is subject to Freedom of Speech. You had a review posted publicly, expect public opinion...both good and bad.

Have fun. Don't believe everything you read on the internet, learn to think for yourself and you will be fine.

Shyla

[Rockheart]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5rJ4g9EMUk

1. You are only presenting one definition of the word coercion. Basically where it pertains to a crime or act against a person. Dig further and you will find other literal and cultural definitions. One of which is alike to "Mild Persuasion" or "Not of ones own freewill" or "suggested". In North America it is a commonly a used term and not specifically criminal.
2. AT NO TIME DID I SAY THERE WAS ANYTHING WRONG WITH COERCING OR PERSUADING OR SUGGESTING SOMEONE TO PUT A REVIEW. NOTHING WRONG, AT ALL, IN MY MIND.
3. I also think a schill pertains more to someone unrealistically promoting something because they have a vested interested, not because they have necessarily been coerced but they can overlap both interpretations. Like when you are a "snake oil" sales man perhaps.
4. I am not talking about alot of cases of coercion or pesuasion. Many people more than graciously put up a real review when asked, as often they may no know the forum exists.
5. I think people that have no particular experience with and escort or without real insight should be calling schill. Just saying schill or posting some image does not prove or show anything. If you have no proof a review is fake and only intend to post one word, you should just back away from the computer. Accusations without proof or insight are just unnecessary noise to me.

[TSFantasia]

Start a Thread For Made Up Rules for Escort Reviewers

I think I am going to start a new thread "Made Up Rules for Escort Reviewers"

Here's a few of the most popular ones

1. Escort MUST NOT in any way indicate that the client could submit a review or direct them to the site where they can.

2. All Escort Reviewers MUST HAVE ESP OR PSYCHIC DREAMS/VISIONS where Neon signs appear with "Tgirlforums", "Hung Angels",
"CERB" "MERB" , etc.

3. Escort Reviewers MUST join the Forum several months/years before they post their first review and participate in discussions &
topics which are of no interest to them so that other "anonymous" members hiding behind "made up usernames" from "made up email
accounts" can know that they are REAL!

4. Escorts MUST NOT ALLOW clients to sign up for their own account on their computer as this ANONYMOUS site collects IP addresses & MAC addresses so if the client doesn't want to use his work office computer or home computer that his wife and kids use then he is SCREWED!

5. Escort reviews that are too similar to other reviews of the same SP are FAKE. Reviews that are too dissimilar to other reviews of the same SP are FAKE.

OK now a few of my own.

1. IF a SP gets more than 2 reviews in a week they are FAKE.

2. If a SP doesn't get at least one review in 6 months THEY are FAKE and DO NOT EXIST.

3. Reviews that state a SP shot a load then was hard again in 5 mins and shot another load then got hard again and topped them and shot another load are FAKE! In 3 years I have never come across anyone capable of this stay hard yes (Viagra, poppers,etc) cum again within 15-20 mins NO.

Feel free to add more of your own meaningless and nonsense rules

[Shyla Wild]

I think I am going to start a new thread "Made Up Rules for Escort Reviewers"

Here's a few of the most popular ones

1. Escort MUST NOT in any way indicate that the client could submit a review or direct them to the site where they can.

2. All Escort Reviewers MUST HAVE ESP OR PSYCHIC DREAMS/VISIONS where Neon signs appear with "Tgirlforums", "Hung Angels",
"CERB" "MERB" , etc.

3. Escort Reviewers MUST join the Forum several months/years before they post their first review and participate in discussions &
topics which are of no interest to them so that other "anonymous" members hiding behind "made up usernames" from "made up email
accounts" can know that they are REAL!

4. Escorts MUST NOT ALLOW clients to sign up for their own account on their computer as this ANONYMOUS site collects IP addresses & MAC addresses so if the client doesn't want to use his work office computer or home computer that his wife and kids use then he is SCREWED!

5. Escort reviews that are too similar to other reviews of the same SP are FAKE. Reviews that are too dissimilar to other reviews of the same SP are FAKE.

OK now a few of my own.

1. IF a SP gets more than 2 reviews in a week they are FAKE.

2. If a SP doesn't get at least one review in 6 months THEY are FAKE and DO NOT EXIST.

3. Reviews that state a SP shot a load then was hard again in 5 mins and shot another load then got hard again and topped them and shot another load are FAKE! In 3 years I have never come across anyone capable of this stay hard yes (Viagra, poppers,etc) cum again within 15-20 mins NO.

Feel free to add more of your own meaningless and nonsense rules

Like you just did?

That is all fine and dandy, but you forget one thing. This is not your house. It's Crag's house...and Crag's rules. You are better off conforming to the system than trying to change what is in place. It's always been like this, and it won't change. And if you knew what the girls are capable of, you better hope it doesn't change. Things are decent now because the review section abuse is down. Minus a few people that abuse it and complain.

I'm amazed we are still discussing this since January.

[TSFantasia]

Like you just did?

That is all fine and dandy, but you forget one thing. This is not your house. It's Crag's house...and Crag's rules. You are better off conforming to the system than trying to change what is in place. It's always been like this, and it won't change. And if you knew what the girls are capable of, you better hope it doesn't change. Things are decent now because the review section abuse is down. Minus a few people that abuse it and complain.

I'm amazed we are still discussing this since January.

No this is actually new posts started by Northern Guy, Vancouverman, Mark Hermatic's reviews of Lucy Bisset which were attacked and Jimmi40 & Hogtownhero's reviews of Seductive Eve that were attacked that I am responding too. And these are not Crags rules (ie new members not allowed to post reviews as a first post)

[vancouverman]

No this is actually new posts started by Northern Guy, Vancouverman, Mark Hermatic's reviews of Lucy Bisset which were attacked and Jimmi40 & Hogtownhero's reviews of Seductive Eve that were attacked that I am responding too. And these are not Crags rules (ie new members not allowed to post reviews as a first post)

Why are you attacking me? We have never met!

[Guest]

I found this hilarious video the other week.

Hi Fantasia,

Your made up rules are really funny. I sat there laughing at the irony.

I've been in many forums for escorts and it amazes me how some sites have rules for everyone to respect - everyone, except the people who actually run the site, that is.

Anyway, this video is pretty funny, too. Maybe it can change the negative mood that has befallen this thread.

I hope you like it. It's lol funny in its own way.

Babe,
xoxo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvPI2GNqI58

[Shyla Wild]

No this is actually new posts started by Northern Guy, Vancouverman, Mark Hermatic's reviews of Lucy Bisset which were attacked and Jimmy & Hogtownhero's reviews of Seductive Eve that were attacked that I am responding too. And these are not Crags rules (ie new members not allowed to post reviews as a first post)

That rule is what stopped all the crap on the review section.

Believe it or not, it works both ways. Just like a girl can write a good review about herself, she can also write a bad review about a competetor. You will not fall victim to this as you are the top girl in Regina, but in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver ...it's dog eat dog. If I got a random bad review I would probably scream shill. Oh the same token, if you look at one of my last reviews, it was by a poster with 1 review. I myself scolded the user and I will probably ask for it to be removed. Why? It does not help my reputation. If fact, I find that it is a dark spot as I do not like my reputation questioned, and that type of review can do just that.

Fantasia, you seem like a smart girl. You seem like you have your life in order and you give a good service... Why are you letting this bother you? Do you really care what others think?

Let it go girl, you will be better off.

[Rockheart]

No this is actually new posts started by Northern Guy, Vancouverman, Mark Hermatic's reviews of Lucy Bisset which were attacked and Jimmi40 & Hogtownhero's reviews of Seductive Eve that were attacked that I am responding too. And these are not Crags rules (ie new members not allowed to post reviews as a first post)

No one makes the rules here but me
There is no rule against anything like this.

I have not had one report of a attack, nor did I assign anyone to defend anyone.

As I say over and over.
If you are offended or attacked or there is a post against you.
REPORT IT.
There is a report icon on every post.
Otherwise i will assume you enjoy fighting.

thanks

[TSFantasia]

Why are you attacking me? We have never met!

Chill I am supportive of your views and position

[Shyla Wild]

Otherwise i will assume you enjoy fighting.

thanks

That is funny shit

[TSFantasia]

No one makes the rules here but me
There is no rule against anything like this.

I have not had one report of a attack, nor did I assign anyone to defend anyone.

As I say over and over.
If you are offended or attacked or there is a post against you.
REPORT IT.
There is a report icon on every post.
Otherwise i will assume you enjoy fighting.

thanks

This is not a defence of a specific post just my response to this thread and to similar ones with the SHILL word being thrown around. I know this is not your rule it is a "made up rule" of those who consider themselves senior members, posting experts, review experts, etc. that they would like to impose on new posters/reviewers, which in the long run only discourages new members and new reviewers with a fresh perspective and approach and new to the T-girl experience.

[vancouverman]

Chill I am supportive of your views and position

Great. Hope you come to vancouver. I promise to see you, post a review, and hopefully not be called a shill I won't give you higher than a 9 just to be safe.