Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why People don't post Reviews

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why People don't post Reviews

    I would like to comment on the recent need for other members of this board to doubt some of the stories posted on here. Or the need to insult people for their version of what happened during an encounter. Our fairly new resident lawyer seems to be posting his overly detailed opinions without anyone ever asking for them. (I suspect we will all get tired of his attempts to sound more intelligent than the rest of us, he’ll get tired of us no longer being entertained by him and eventually he’ll go away.) The bottom line is that we really have no reason to give false reviews of our encounters. (Other than the fact that Lucy offered someone a freebie. LOL.) Personally I am very hesitant to mention any encounters as many of you are so quick to jump on the reviewer and not understand that it is our version of what happened. Each encounter with every girl will be different and they may not impress all of us every time. The purpose of this board is to get an understanding of who is providing a quality service for the money we are willing to spend. So gentlemen, weed out what you want to believe, choose whether or not to throw caution to the wind and ignore our warnings, or dive in wholeheartedly when you have read enough about someone to know you’ll have a great time with them. Thanks for reading,

    KC

  • #2
    Re: Why People don't post Reviews

    i'm really curious to know who you think is the "resident lawyer"? I have a pretty good idea but i'd like to see it anyway.....lol

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Why People don't post Reviews

      I can see how some people may think the only use for this site is for reviews but infact it is a FORUM for many things to discuss.
      When it comes to reviews I think people could me more tactful. Perhaps a general score sheet of relavant information would be more appropriate rather then reading something written like a script from a tv show. ( too much drama at times )


      Example:

      1) Looks like her picture (yes) (no)
      2) She was clean (yes) (no)
      3) Top (yes) (no)
      4) Bottom (yes) (no)
      5) Full service (yes) (no)
      6) Were you satisfied (yes) (no)

      etc;

      I think this format would prove to be more useful in the end for everyone.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Why People don't post Reviews

        I agree with Shelby that having some commonality amongst the reviews would be helpful, but there does need to be some descriptive element, otherwise the reviews are bereft of any life.

        I also agree with KC - the only people who know for sure what happened are the two that were there. Even then, their accounts will each be different.

        Beyond that, it is up to each of us to assess the content for ourselves - is the poster an established member, or are they a newer poster (got to watch out for shilling or "negative campaigning")? Are other posts/reviews consistent with the review, or not? Best of all, as above, does your personal experience outweigh the review? If you have experience with the lady being reviewed, then you don't need to rely on the review. If you must post, simply post that - e.g., I met with x, and my experience was y.

        That being said, it would have been nice if you had posted a review in the first place!

        If we want this board to be useful, we need to encourage, not discourage, posting. As KC pointed out, people don't post reviews. If you think a little, it isn't hard to see why.

        Take care
        I'm not anti-semantic - words are some of my best friends!

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Why People don't post Reviews

          Originally posted by etrigan
          I agree with Shelby that having some commonality amongst the reviews would be helpful, but there does need to be some descriptive element, otherwise the reviews are bereft of any life.

          I also agree with KC - the only people who know for sure what happened are the two that were there. Even then, their accounts will each be different.

          Beyond that, it is up to each of us to assess the content for ourselves - is the poster an established member, or are they a newer poster (got to watch out for shilling or "negative campaigning")? Are other posts/reviews consistent with the review, or not? Best of all, as above, does your personal experience outweigh the review? If you have experience with the lady being reviewed, then you don't need to rely on the review. If you must post, simply post that - e.g., I met with x, and my experience was y.

          That being said, it would have been nice if you had posted a review in the first place!

          If we want this board to be useful, we need to encourage, not discourage, posting. As KC pointed out, people don't post reviews. If you think a little, it isn't hard to see why.

          Take care

          Thanks etrigan. My thought was to remove creative/or derogatory comments. I suppose a small area could be left for a few "life" full comments but I think most people just want to know the bottom lines as each encounter is personal and different for everyone. Though Ive heard tales of some working as though they were on a assembly line. lol
          For sure always be wise to the shills and the bashing which is silly and obvious. There is room for everyone and every man has his desires so stooping to those tactics is futile.
          The most trustworthy reviews come from active members of the forum. Unfortunately there are few willing to do little more then look at pictures.
          When I see a review I check back and see what else the person has written.
          Guys, do your research and you usually come out smilling.

          Comment



          Working...
          X