Cancelling Refractory Period

[hug4312]

Hey whats up! just wanted to know if some people tried cabergoline or pramipexole (progesterone inhibitors) for shortening/cancelling refractory period.
anti progestins have the ability to cancel out refractory period (refractory period caused by secretion of prolactin) and allow to keep having sex after ejaculating without any discomfort.
These products look very fun but they are quite expensive. wanted to know if anyone had tried it?

If not, well this is some info peole might find interesting

[Ray]

Lucy, who doesn't seem to have refractory problems once told me that she eats hazel nuts everyday and that is why she can perform w/o any problems. I tried them but they didn't do anything for me.

[hug4312]

Lucy, who doesn't seem to have refractory problems once told me that she eats hazel nuts everyday and that is why she can perform w/o any problems. I tried them but they didn't do anything for me.

Damn hazelnuts... I guess its just a genetic thing for her then, lucky lucy lol.
Anyways I might try the caber soon and post about it.

[hug4312]

good point crag.... but still :P

[dom r]

This exists for reason.Or we would fuck ourselves to death

Nah, that was a concern by mother nature starting in the stone age cave man years and after that if males were able to cum again and again (multiple orgasms as often as women can) including not forming E.D.(or some degree of) after 30 to 50 and over, it would lead to over population and eventually extinction from the result of. Sadly nature intended men's sexual capabilities to be weaker than womens to prevent over population(and for other reasons), but we are living in a modern age where we are advanced enough by different means to prevent over population, including there are so many different ways to have sex that doesnt involve penis inside vagina at all, and that sex to orgasm is 99.99999% of the time only for pleasure and orgasm not pregnancy. There should also be advancments and treatments to completely prevent E.D. with age. Im all for it. This is 2018 where cumming is for pleasure, its not year 1 anymore.

[PC7]

Your theory doesn't make sense. Once a woman is pregnant, no matter how much semen you pump into her, she cannot start a second pregnancy until the current one is over one way or another. The number of women having babies that survive determines the population. Before modern times, fetal and maternal mortality was very high. Life spans was also very short compared to modern times. The world population is rising exponentially for many reasons including longer life spans,lower neonatal death rate, lower maternal death rate (allowing women to have more babies), lower childhood death rate (allowing children to grow old enough to reproduce). The refractory period has some evolutionary reason but I don't think your reasons are true.
Just my opinion of course.

[dom r]

Your theory doesnt make sense.Once a woman is pregnant,no matter how much semen you pump into her,she cannot start a second pregnancy until the current one is over.Before modern times,fetal and maternal mortality was very high.Life spans was also very short compared to modern times.The refractory period has some evolutionary reason but I dont think your reasons are true.Just my opinion of course.

I think im correct. Nature's plan to prevent over population started with the earliest humans and there after as we continued living longer. Nature created men to become sexually tired after our first orgasm to prevent over population (and for other reasons) by not having sex with OTHER (or same) women during the same day or night. And men's sexual capabilities weaken with age far greater than women of same age for the same reasons. This is the modern age now, sex is almost entirely for pleasure not pregnancy, sexual capabilities should be equal between genders and as we age.

[hug4312]

lol this is going somewhere i had not intended

[PC7]

Sex for reproduction does decline with both sexes as people age. Women past 40 have a very difficult time getting pregnant. Men can conceive comparatively easily well beyond that. Nature tends to limit over population by resources (eg. Food supply). When there is abundant supplies, population tends to boom. The ability to have sex multiple times with 20 women in 1 day would not increase the population. You can impregnate those 20 women over 20 days and after 9 months still only have 20 births (assuming no multiple births).

[dom r]

Sex for reproduction does decline with both sexes as people age.Women past 40 have a very difficult time getting pregnant.Men can conceive comparatively easily well beyond that.

It seems the other reason why nature wants men all spent after their first cum including in between first cums is to give women a resting time period away from intercourse. But during this time frame of not having intercourse, women will have their orgasms in the many different ways they have sex, which includes having their multiples. Sure after 40, 50 its more difficult for women to become pregnant but between 40 to 80 women are having way way more orgasms than men of same age group, why?, is it because nature sees that men already preformed their duty of reproduction when they were younger?, and that women cannot reproduce by orgasm so they're capable to have way way more of it? Wheres the gender equality please for sex just for pleasure that doesn't involve dic in vagina? Make it happen.

[FalconHeavy]

Lucy

Lucy, who doesn't seem to have refractory problems once told me that she eats hazel nuts everyday and that is why she can perform w/o any problems. I tried them but they didn't do anything for me.

The nuts probably don’t hurt and may even help, but I think she likely has good genetics on her side to help with a short refractory period...
C’est la vie!! So much the better for her lucky gentleman!! Something I hope to see in person one day...

[Shyla Wild]

Nah, that was a concern by mother nature starting in the stone age cave man years and after that if males were able to cum again and again (multiple orgasms as often as women can) including not forming E.D.(or some degree of) after 30 to 50 and over, it would lead to over population and eventually extinction from the result of. Sadly nature intended men's sexual capabilities to be weaker than womens to prevent over population(and for other reasons), but we are living in a modern age where we are advanced enough by different means to prevent over population, including there are so many different ways to have sex that doesnt involve penis inside vagina at all, and that sex to orgasm is 99.99999% of the time only for pleasure and orgasm not pregnancy. There should also be advancments and treatments to completely prevent E.D. with age. Im all for it. This is 2018 where cumming is for pleasure, its not year 1 anymore.

Only one problem with your theory Life expectancy during the stone age was maybe age 20-24 if they were really lucky

[dom r]

Only one problem with your theory Life expectancy during the stone age was maybe age 20-24 if they were really lucky

May be, but i did mention stone age years AND AFTER, after includes after stone age time period to today as life expectancy increased....but some sites say "the estimated maximum life expectancy for prehistoric humans is 35 years,this does not mean the average person died at the age of 35,another person might have lived to be 70". This caveman certainly looks over 50-(jokin-gotta be the very first color photo ever taken or hes the very first genius that invented an hd camera that probably got destroyed during the ice age, jokin- probably smiling because hes the very first man to use viagra, because nature made females not to need viagra until they hit umm umm oh 90.-