Transsexuals Can Never Find True Love?

[Amethyst Dark]

not all

Some shemales are only here for their interim, I plan on living as a woman after September 2010, *maybe* do a post-op porn, yaneverknow.

PACO, honestly, do you think all Tgrrls are homosexuals who are pretending to be women or would you be willing to say maybe a quarter are like that. I can't believe Allanah Star is a guy turning into a grrl, she is too femme in her interview answers.

[capitus]

in the interest of historical correctness, I must point out that Johnny only sang it. June Carter wrote it.

ITT, you are right on the money. However, the learnin' came from the feelin', and the burning feelin' came from Johnny...

Unless the reason for your burning thing is an STI!

...or really spicey Indian food.


And for the record Indian food and country music are amoral. That's my story and I'm sticking to it!!

[toban]

Guilt by association

Hey Paco I have just thought of a very good and current example to illustrate my point about ?guilt by association?.

That example is the quite recent Maxime Bernier/Julie Chouinard affair which has received so much national notoriety. While Maxime may indeed be a very honourable man, he was essentially tarred, feathered and run out of town because of his choice of lady friend - seemingly a real honey, who had herself, been known to associate with underworld characters, who were known by authorities to be of particularly objectionable moral standards! Even so, Julie should still be assumed to be an honorable person.

So, in the end Julie was tainted because of her association with certain underworld characters and in turn Maxime was also tainted because of Julie?s contamination. Of course it still remains to be seen how ?clean" both taintees really are! Maybe Maxime, maybe Julie, maybe both or maybe neither!


I still can't accept that you believe what you said, so I have to assume you too are an honourable person !


[quote=toban;141351]
At the time I made my comment earlier I was thinking back to the old saying that went something like: "He who lays with dogs has fleas"


My point was then, that in your post you implied initially that the morals of t-girl escorts especially, were "all fucked up" yet by association then, your own morals would have been tainted by your association with the immorality of the T-girls.

Besides, my sampling of Tgirl Warez has nothing to do with their morality (when i say their morality, not every single one of course, but a very sizable minority or probably a majority which would then be true in a Gaussian sense).................... [/quote]

So sure, your sampling of their wares would tend to support the point that by your association with them you approved of their unacceptable morals.

[snoodle]

never say never ...

[Paco]

"PACO, honestly, do you think all Tgrrls are homosexuals who are pretending to be women or would you be willing to say maybe a quarter are like that. I can't believe Allanah Star is a guy turning into a grrl, she is too femme in her interview answers."

Tgirls have XY chromsomes. All XY are male, so THEY ARE MALE. They, as a group,are mostly exclusively attracted to males. Since Tgirls are XY and all XY are male and Gaussian analysis would show the vast majority of Tgirls are attracted to males, therefore they are as a group are mostly homosexual males.

The outlier Tgirls who are not attracted to males would be chasing after females and therefore have their decadent and debauched behaviour curtailed by females.

"My point was then, that in your post you implied initially that the morals of t-girl escorts especially, were "all fucked up" yet by association then, your own morals would have been tainted by your association with the immorality of the T-girls."

You would have to show that the sex grouping i belong to (straight males attracted to some shemales) behave in a manner that is as decadent and debauched as Tgirl escorts. I don't see that. You may have a point in saying that our behaviour is more "fucked up" than straight guys not attracted to Tgirls but that is an empirical question.

And even if the sex grouping i belong to (st8t males attracted to some Tgirls) is as depraved as tgirl escorts are (tgirls escorts as a group, not every single tgirl escort), it doesn't take away from the truthfulness of what i said.

That's where http://www.logicalfallacies.info/tuquoque.html comes in.

It doesn't matter whether i cavort with tgirls or not. It's their behaviour not mine that's in question. Do you get it?

If i hang around and fuck drug addicts but don't take drugs myself and i say drug addicts are scum, the fact that i associate and fuck drug addicts has no bearing on the situtation.

You could argue from a guassian perspective that most people who hang around and fuck drug addicts are addicts themselves and that would be an empirical question that in this hypothetical scenerio would not apply to me as i would be an outlier.

[toban]

This discussion has become way too deep for me.

OK, I give up!

The last time I had any connection with Gauss it was Carl Friedrich, who was honoured by having the Gauss (a unit of magnetic flux density or magnetic induction), named after him!

[tsevana]

Well....
All i got to say one thing..very simple

Even the ts (escorts) took a drug or whatever..is their businesss. and as long they do their job..

I believe u know me VERY WELL EH PACO..

[Paco]

Yup, that's him.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution