LexXxi from Shemale Canada - 411

[catwithahat69]

Hi all,

My first post under this handle as I can't seem to activate my previous (rarely used) one.

I tried a few searches but haven't come accross any info on LexXxi. She's coming to Calgary this week and I'm contemplating a visit as she looks pretty hot but would really prefer some recon beforehand.



Thanks,
Cat69

[catwithahat69]

Sorry

Sorry folks, I happened to come accross a thread on alexi which appears to be the same girl and wasn't terribly complimentary about rates or service.

Sorry also to the mods as I probably posted both of these notes in the wrong section.

Cat69

[capitus]

Yes LexXxi and Alexi are the same girl. She is great if you like ridiculously overpriced poor service. I was a first timer and she scared me away from T-girls for 2 years...thank goodness a trip to Toronto cured me.

[Hoozier Daddy]

A review from shemale canada:

she was down in Calgary for a few days and well this is my opinion

the good : very nice looking, nice tits, c--k, legs, hair, etc,
nice hotel and safe,
very agressive, and open minded, willing to do your choice.
I didnt have to travel to Edmonton

the bad : rushing you out the door after 20-25 min, saying she has someone else coming.

and the price of 350-400-500, was a bit steep for 25 min.

you might want to invest elsewhere.

Another ripoff victim....

[capitus]

A sucker is born every minute...Like the guy with the accent says, "Save your Money".

[Hoozier Daddy]

Funny how on that other forum, 3 first time posters have rushed in to try and offer a complete 180 as to her long time rep. They are all worded the same way and are obvious self promotion schills by someone who doesn't want her dirty little secrets to come out

[markerverse]

What's Different ??

Please for my personal edification ,,,,,, what is wrong with Lexxi, or anyone else for matter, placing a 'value' on their companionship in the higher scale of a fluctuating market ?? It may be in the extreme to some while others find no cause for concern.

Is the service provider restricted in the asking fee??

I believe the point here rests within the agreement. If I, the consumer, agree to the terms set out by the provider, and neither side waivers it's a deal. At least within the agreement. Actual participation may fall well short of expectations for a number of reasons. If deliberate by either party penalty or rebate should apply. But again. the agreement should so specify.

No one forced the consumer to pay inflationary prices. Why bother lamenting after the fact. Once the legal tender left the buyers hand the deal was solidified.

There are those who seek and those who will be found.
I do happens to many ,,,the I don'ts pay the freight with regrets.

[capitus]

Please for my personal edification ,,,,,, what is wrong with Lexxi, or anyone else for matter, placing a 'value' on their companionship in the higher scale of a fluctuating market ?? It may be in the extreme to some while others find no cause for concern.

Is the service provider restricted in the asking fee??

I believe the point here rests within the agreement. If I, the consumer, agree to the terms set out by the provider, and neither side waivers it's a deal. At least within the agreement. Actual participation may fall well short of expectations for a number of reasons. If deliberate by either party penalty or rebate should apply. But again. the agreement should so specify.

No one forced the consumer to pay inflationary prices. Why bother lamenting after the fact. Once the legal tender left the buyers hand the deal was solidified.

There are those who seek and those who will be found.
I do happens to many ,,,the I don'ts pay the freight with regrets.

Agreed. Caveat emptor always applies. One does not have to pay such outrageous rates. Everyone is free to pay $100K for a 1982 VW Rabbit if they so choose. However, the first timer may not realize that this is not the "industry standard". Hence these threads.

For me the problem with LexXxi was not strictly financial. If I felt I had gotten my moneys worth I would say nothing. As a first-timer (read:sucker) I paid upfront what I thought was the "going rate" which later turned out to be >3X the average in other locales. As an untutored horndog I just paid and waited for the fireworks. Those fireworks turned out to be rather subpar (CBJ (both ways), HJ, did not get hard or into it*). Of course I didn't realize this was not the "standard" until I had another go at it....with Lucy B. Looking back I wish I had read posts like these and been more informed.

So Markerverse you are correct, the deal is in the agreement of both parties. There is an offer, consideration, and acceptance. This does not mean it was a good deal...and this does not mean that those who found after-the-fact that this was not such a good deal should not let others know that is was not such a good deal. I thought that was the point of this board?


*yes, I realise YMMV: That being said I am very hygenic, courteous, polite, clean, etc. AND this has never been and issue with any other SP since...and it appears I am not alone in my assessment.

[capitus]

Please for my personal edification ,,,,,, what is wrong with Lexxi, or anyone else for matter, placing a 'value' on their companionship in the higher scale of a fluctuating market ?? .

All are allowed to place a price (rather than value) on their companionship....just as all are allowed to rate that price and compare it to its percieved value.

[markerverse]

Your not Excused !

Choices are made -agreements struck - the order placed. If the product is damaged and/or otherwise found unsatisfactory you may return for a refund excluding freight charges. Mind you, there must be a 'return' policy within the sales agreement.

You've selected a girl -agreed on a service fee -made appointment arrangements- you arrive at the destination.

You open your eyes and observe. If anything about the girls appearance....anything .... is a turn off for you ..WALK. OR ... You smell unpleasant odours about the dwelling .... it turns you off...turn and WALK. .... or the agreement fee is elevated.. it turns you off ... turn and WALK.

But please, please don't post a tale of what should have been as opposed to what actually was.
The weeping and gnashing of teeth because all the 'T' weren?t crossed or 'i' dotted is usually reserved for the fool with eyes to see with and together with the rest of his senses, turned them all off to satiate his lust.

If you don't know enough to turn and exit an appointment, when all or part of the original agreement is altered or missing altogether, than I suggest you seek less expensive methods of entertainment.

[Hoozier Daddy]

I'll cut through the bullshit. Her game is to overcharge and under deliver at every stepbecause she thinks that she can get away with it based on the lack of 'competition' in her market. I'm calling a spade a shovel in hopes that others don't get sucker'd.

[capitus]

Excused? I don't ask to be excused.

If you don't know enough to turn and exit an appointment, when all or part of the original agreement is altered or missing altogether, than I suggest you seek less expensive methods of entertainment.

Again, I agree. First timers often don't know enough to do this, thus this thread and board. I think the point of this thread addresses the
"...[seeking] less expensive methods of entertainment" portion of your argument (i.e. seek services elsewhere).

Markerverse, I'm not sure what your overriding point is. Let me see if I've got this straight....are you saying that if one has had a bad experience (be it financial or service based) with a provider via a mutually agreed upon deal, the client should not let others know, or not complain about said poor service because they had a mutually agreed upon deal? Again, I have to ask, "what the hell is the point of a review board then?"

The statements made say nothing of LexXxi as a person. She may be delightful. I don't know. The posts are about retrospective perceived value. She is beautiful. She is expensive. She does not perform as other SP do. The crux of the argument is expensive AND renders poor service.
One does not know the agreement has been altered until after the encounter at which time exiting the contract seems a bit futile...and I don't remember any sales agreement, warantee, or money back policy....hence this thread.

[capitus]

I'll cut through the bullshit. Her game is to overcharge and under deliver at every stepbecause she thinks that she can get away with it based on the lack of 'competition' in her market. I'm calling a spade a shovel in hopes that others don't get sucker'd.

Exactly. If others get suckered however, they can come to this board and talk about it...

"Hi, I'm capitus and I'm a sucker" "Hi capitus" ...followed by 11 more steps to recovery.

[markerverse]

capitus

It was not my intention to prolong viewpoints, mine or others, into exhaustion. I've printed mine in plain composition. You've brought yours in partial rebuttal. I doubt anything useful will be achieved with additional comments from me.

[Admin]

Well I think the theme here is she seems to charge more than the going market rate.

Personally I do not think it is criminal for a girl to charge what she wants to, unless the price is changing when you get there or something. I mean u have to wonder, when the girls are charging bottom basement rates also.

It's obvious she is very beautiful and seems to have all the assets, so there must be a few that have had a good time with her.
I'd say that even with the negative comments, I might still give her a go.
I'd say YMMV.

Anyway unless anyone has any new info on this girl.......