CCCanada, Bawdy Houses and municipal laws
[QUOTE=AlexisDVyne;341915] . . . . . No one ever gets busted for a bawdy house because it cannot be enforced on a single girl. . . . . . . .[/QUOTE]
If you check the law carefully (see 1 below) you will find it definitely can, and has been, in the past (see 2 below).
1. - Criminal Code of Canada:-http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/a...-102.html#h-70
2. - Here is another link to a discussion re: bawdy house definition. http://www2.parl.gc.ca/content/lop/researchpublications/prb0330-e.htm#offences
I've copied a part of it below and underlined a relevant bit. Read further on in this paper you'll also find discussion of the municipal liscensing issue too:-
Section 197(1) defines the relevant terms. “Common bawdy-house” means a place that is kept or occupied, or resorted to by one or more persons, for the purpose of prostitution or to practise acts of indecency. Courts have interpreted this to mean that any defined space is capable of being a bawdy-house, from a hotel, to a house, to a parking lot – provided that there is frequent or habitual use of it for the purposes of prostitution or for the practice of acts of indecency,(18) and the premises are controlled or managed by prostitutes or individuals with a right or interest in that space.(19) Further, the test used to determine whether an act is indecent is a community standard of tolerance.(20) Within this framework, the interpretation of indecency will depend on context, taking into account factors such as consent, the composition of any audience and the level of privacy of the room, community reputation of the place, and any harm caused.(21) For example, if the room is private, or if there is no actual physical contact between a client and an entertainer, then an act is less likely to be labelled “indecent.”(22)
I can recall a case many years ago where in Winnipeg an escort was flagged at the request of the income tax people, whatever they were called at that time, because they suspected she was filing incorrect income figures. The RCMP and tax officers then put her and her home under surveilance for quite some period of time. In court there was testifimony as to the number of condoms found in her trash etc..and records of the number of clients in and out. From this they estimated her annual income and she was required to pay tax on that amount probably plus fines and penalties I suppose. She was convicted also on bawdy house charges. All of this was reported in the newspapers of the day.
[QUOTE=AlexisDVyne;341915] . . . . . No one ever gets busted for a bawdy house because it cannot be enforced on a single girl. . . . . . . .[/QUOTE]
If you check the law carefully (see 1 below) you will find it definitely can, and has been, in the past (see 2 below).
1. - Criminal Code of Canada:-http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/a...-102.html#h-70
2. - Here is another link to a discussion re: bawdy house definition. http://www2.parl.gc.ca/content/lop/researchpublications/prb0330-e.htm#offences
I've copied a part of it below and underlined a relevant bit. Read further on in this paper you'll also find discussion of the municipal liscensing issue too:-
Section 197(1) defines the relevant terms. “Common bawdy-house” means a place that is kept or occupied, or resorted to by one or more persons, for the purpose of prostitution or to practise acts of indecency. Courts have interpreted this to mean that any defined space is capable of being a bawdy-house, from a hotel, to a house, to a parking lot – provided that there is frequent or habitual use of it for the purposes of prostitution or for the practice of acts of indecency,(18) and the premises are controlled or managed by prostitutes or individuals with a right or interest in that space.(19) Further, the test used to determine whether an act is indecent is a community standard of tolerance.(20) Within this framework, the interpretation of indecency will depend on context, taking into account factors such as consent, the composition of any audience and the level of privacy of the room, community reputation of the place, and any harm caused.(21) For example, if the room is private, or if there is no actual physical contact between a client and an entertainer, then an act is less likely to be labelled “indecent.”(22)
I can recall a case many years ago where in Winnipeg an escort was flagged at the request of the income tax people, whatever they were called at that time, because they suspected she was filing incorrect income figures. The RCMP and tax officers then put her and her home under surveilance for quite some period of time. In court there was testifimony as to the number of condoms found in her trash etc..and records of the number of clients in and out. From this they estimated her annual income and she was required to pay tax on that amount probably plus fines and penalties I suppose. She was convicted also on bawdy house charges. All of this was reported in the newspapers of the day.
Comment