Another false religious holiday: Easter

[Bacchus Boy]

The new easter

ya, use to be a great pagan rite of Spring and fertility!! How about this - "A touching story about a man who died on a cross and was placed in a cave; he rose again and when he rolled back the stone - if he saw his shadow there was six more weeks of winter!?

[Guest]

I've got to say, myself and I'm sure most of the members here just roll their eyes, tolerating your mindless daily comments & power postings, with everything put in a quote box for whatever reason.

A while back I made a simple political joke on one of your threads with no offence intended. The result was a constant bombardment of PMs from you demanding that I take it down immediately, then harassing moderators to take it down.

It became so annoying seeing another of your message alerts pop up every time I logged in, that I needed to block you. That was the first time I've ever needed to do that.

I honestly do have sympathy for people with "issues"... as long as it doesn't affect me.

Then I read this long anti-religious rant, doused with hurtful images (to religious people). Doesn't really affect me one way or the other personally, but I'm sure that there are people on this forum who may have been offended by this mindless drivel yet haven't spoken up for fear of starting a war of words.

So in your little world, it's okay for you to offend others, but it's not okay for others to offend you.

Such a fucking hypocrite.

Go away.

Yes, I remember Babe's first outing in this forum and I remember she got into a huff with some people. Then started blanking out some of her posts and left. Surprised when she showed up again.

.

[rider014]

Throw away the sheets

Depends what you do with all that chocolate

Oh my!!

[dom r]

QUOTE by other poster-
"Dom, a mother breast feeding her child is not a sexual act.
Some societies (i think the USA) just don't want to see a woman's breast being pulled out in public, because they can't see the breastfeeding for what it is - only breast feeding. People are too afraid that some man will get a good (GASP!!) look at a baby suckling and fantasize about it in a sexual way."
-------

I agree with you 100%, a woman breastfeeding who does NOT become sexually aroused by it is only breastfeeding and not engaging in anything sexual even when its extended breastfeeding because theres NO sexual arousal. ALTHOUGH a woman who DOES become sexually aroused by it, no matter if its wanted or not or ignored or can't be controlled, especially when its continuously like 5, 10, 30 or more minutes and leads to a sexual climax, and then she repeats this everyday, that is breastfeeding also becomes sexual and (the word that everyone is so afraid of) pedo****** because whos doing the fondling and suckling?

But I do agree even when women do this during breastfeeding, their mind frame is to breastfeed but they are trying to hide and mask the sexual aspect of it and turn it into something that is false and untrue claiming sexual arousal to orgasm is not sexual when the word sexual is in sexual arousal. There is NO WAY that the norms of society and women will ever admit to this and will always be in denial of this truth because they know you put an adult in any other situation with a ? leading to the same results, he or she (ESPECIALLY he) will appear on the Nancy Grace show and be called a C. M. and get 15 years in the slammer. That is why these women (40% of women who breastfeed reported sexual arousal in surveys) totally mask the sexual aspect of it and falsely claim its not sexual when it is due to fear.

Im going to picture myself getting on female hormones and growing breasts and being able to breastfeed. Theres no way in hell that I would get sexually aroused by it because I know what that would make me. Just because they are female all of a sudden this no longer applies? That is total a double standard and hypocrisy, including within the law that allows this. Breastfeeding is only breastfeeding, breastfeeding with continued sexual arousal especially to climax is a whole lot more no matter what excuse they use to try to hide or justify it.

I could hear Nancy Grace right now saying, "sexual arousal during breastfeeding is not sexual or pedo******". Have Nancy Grace watch youtube videos(youtube or the law wouldn't allow such videos anyways) showing men or transgenders who were perfectly capable of breastfeeding become sexually aroused continuously (that is noticable to the eye and everyone knows why) during breastfeeding and breastfondling all of a sudden Nancy Grace would see that in a different dark light and call them P's on her show and demand their arrest. That would make Nancy Grace and the law hypocrites and male/trans gender haters.

[Guest]

.

[Guest]

I've got to say, myself and I'm sure most of the members here just roll their eyes, tolerating your mindless daily comments & power postings, with everything put in a quote box for whatever reason.

A while back I made a simple political joke on one of your threads with no offence intended. The result was a constant bombardment of PMs from you demanding that I take it down immediately, then harassing moderators to take it down.

It became so annoying seeing another of your message alerts pop up every time I logged in, that I needed to block you. That was the first time I've ever needed to do that.

I honestly do have sympathy for people with "issues"... as long as it doesn't affect me.

Then I read this long anti-religious rant, doused with hurtful images (to religious people). Doesn't really affect me one way or the other personally, but I'm sure that there are people on this forum who may have been offended by this mindless drivel yet haven't spoken up for fear of starting a war of words.

So in your little world, it's okay for you to offend others, but it's not okay for others to offend you.

Such a fucking hypocrite.

Go away.

Yes, I remember Babe's first outing in this forum and I remember she got into a huff with some people. Then started blanking out some of her posts and left. Surprised when she showed up again.

.

[TSFantasia]

From my understanding both Easter and Christmas dates were adopted by the Roman Church after Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity or choose it as the most popular religion at the time to unite his empire. As conversion to Catholicism/Christianity was no longer a personal choice but a mandatory obligation of the citizens of the empire it was thought the transition would be easier if current "pagan" religious holidays and festivities were adopted and "Christianized" for the masses.

[dom r]

Hi, I noticed you dont want your posts quoted so i'll edit my other reply.

Physical contact with another person no matter what they are doing resulting in sexual arousal especially when its continuously is in fact sexual, if its from a mother or daughter its also incest, a very young person its also pedophilia. Certainly because its deemed illegal women who are constantly aroused during breastfeeding or who actually get off on it will find any possible phony excuse to justify it and that is why they'll always be in denial of the truth. To claim a woman "has to" breastfeed and "can't prevent" becoming sexually aroused doesn't make it non-sexual and non-pedophilia, rather maby it makes it innocent pedophilia, I will agree with you on that much maby(?).

In fact if women are purposely seeking them just for the sole purpose of getting off during breastfeeding the law would in fact arrest them as this did in fact happen to women resulting in arrests. So this clearly proves the law does see this as pedophilia. They are just seen as innocent(?) when they "have to" breastfeed and "cant help" becoming aroused and "can't prevent" that uncontrollable huge orgasm(sounds like extreme lust in reality if they really can't help popping) but are seen as guilty when they WANT IT. Makes me wonder, who the hell would "not want" an orgasm? Thats gotta be the biggest lie a humanbeing can make in the history of all human kind. I think theyre guilty either way to be honest whether they want to be aroused or "cant help it" because the feeling of lust is always the same.

"WOW"............this is the hardcore truth.

If someone were to post hidden and candid videos on Youtube showing the real thing including real facial emotions and sound of a female woman getting off during breastfeeding and breastfondling or a transgender woman achieving a 20 minute erection during breastfeeding and we'll see everyone calling them a pedoe before youtube deletes the videos. In reality this is considered illegal by the law but the law will not be enforced when its a female woman doing this because its so well masked by the feeding of the breasts like a secret society in denial.

QU-Do I like to watch those breastfeeding youtube videos that are there now?(Answer- I better not say because its ok for women to breastfeed and get breastfondled and get aroused by it but not ok for men to watch it on video?-H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-S-Y in the most extreme). All im saying people need to stop being phony about it and stop claiming sexual arousal during breastfondling and breastfeeding is not sexual and not pedodome when the word sexual is in sexual arousal and when we all know what ages the very young people are that women do this with.

[Guest]

Thank you very much, Dom.

Hi Dom,

Thanks for the respect.
I do appreciate your consideration.

Again, i don't mind being quoted, i only repectfully ask that people leave out the text that does not appear when the "quote" button is used. People can still see the original post simply by clicking on the blue arrow.

Much love, for that.
Babe,
xoxo

[Guest]

hmmm...

Hi dom,

In my example, the massage was a one time thing. It doesn't happen every day.

So you are saying that in my questions, the son would be having sexual relations with the mother and the mother would be unknowingly having a form of sexual relations with her son?

It's only a back massage. The son was not fantasizing about having sex with his mom.

You've claimed it's "hardcore truth" what you say, But where is this "truth", from?
Is there a study i can read or something?
Or are these "truths" only based your own personal perception?

Babe,
xoxo

[Guest]

I've got to say, myself and I'm sure most of the members here just roll their eyes, tolerating your mindless daily comments & power postings, with everything put in a quote box for whatever reason.

A while back I made a simple political joke on one of your threads with no offence intended. The result was a constant bombardment of PMs from you demanding that I take it down immediately, then harassing moderators to take it down.

It became so annoying seeing another of your message alerts pop up every time I logged in, that I needed to block you. That was the first time I've ever needed to do that.

I honestly do have sympathy for people with "issues"... as long as it doesn't affect me.

Then I read this long anti-religious rant, doused with hurtful images (to religious people). Doesn't really affect me one way or the other personally, but I'm sure that there are people on this forum who may have been offended by this mindless drivel yet haven't spoken up for fear of starting a war of words.

So in your little world, it's okay for you to offend others, but it's not okay for others to offend you.

Such a fucking hypocrite.

Go away.

Yes, I remember Babe's first outing in this forum and I remember she got into a huff with some people. Then started blanking out some of her posts and left. Surprised when she showed up again.

.

[dom r]

Its the fact that the mother is giving him a back massage causing him sexual arousal that makes it sexual and incest and yes a sex act or sexual relation. Yes physical contact causing sexual arousal IS HAVING SEX no matter what they are doing, it could be dancing, a massage, breastfeeding, vibration, masturbation, blow job or fucking, sex is sex if it results in sexual arousal. See- "sex"ual arousal, sex is in sexual arousal, being "sex"ually aroused is having "sex" no matter if its 1 minute or 1 hour. He does know its the mother giving him the massage therefore he is being guilty. If the mother does not get sexually aroused then she herself is not having sex but the son is, if shes getting aroused and hes a kid then shes guilty of both pedohome and insest just like in breastfeeding and breastfondling.

[Guest]

I've got to say, myself and I'm sure most of the members here just roll their eyes, tolerating your mindless daily comments & power postings, with everything put in a quote box for whatever reason.

A while back I made a simple political joke on one of your threads with no offence intended. The result was a constant bombardment of PMs from you demanding that I take it down immediately, then harassing moderators to take it down.

It became so annoying seeing another of your message alerts pop up every time I logged in, that I needed to block you. That was the first time I've ever needed to do that.

I honestly do have sympathy for people with "issues"... as long as it doesn't affect me.

Then I read this long anti-religious rant, doused with hurtful images (to religious people). Doesn't really affect me one way or the other personally, but I'm sure that there are people on this forum who may have been offended by this mindless drivel yet haven't spoken up for fear of starting a war of words.

So in your little world, it's okay for you to offend others, but it's not okay for others to offend you.

Such a fucking hypocrite.

Go away.

Yes, I remember Babe's first outing in this forum and I remember she got into a huff with some people. Then started blanking out some of her posts and left. Surprised when she showed up again.

.

[vancouverman]

From my understanding both Easter and Christmas dates were adopted by the Roman Church after Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity or choose it as the most popular religion at the time to unite his empire. As conversion to Catholicism/Christianity was no longer a personal choice but a mandatory obligation of the citizens of the empire it was thought the transition would be easier if current "pagan" religious holidays and festivities were adopted and "Christianized" for the masses.

SHHH.... don't tell Christians this.

They don't care about the truth; so they probably would just blow you off. The power of their desperate desire to believe in an after life and redemption is far more important than the actual facts about their religion.

[Guest]

I've got to say, myself and I'm sure most of the members here just roll their eyes, tolerating your mindless daily comments & power postings, with everything put in a quote box for whatever reason.

A while back I made a simple political joke on one of your threads with no offence intended. The result was a constant bombardment of PMs from you demanding that I take it down immediately, then harassing moderators to take it down.

It became so annoying seeing another of your message alerts pop up every time I logged in, that I needed to block you. That was the first time I've ever needed to do that.

I honestly do have sympathy for people with "issues"... as long as it doesn't affect me.

Then I read this long anti-religious rant, doused with hurtful images (to religious people). Doesn't really affect me one way or the other personally, but I'm sure that there are people on this forum who may have been offended by this mindless drivel yet haven't spoken up for fear of starting a war of words.

So in your little world, it's okay for you to offend others, but it's not okay for others to offend you.

Such a fucking hypocrite.

Go away.

Yes, I remember Babe's first outing in this forum and I remember she got into a huff with some people. Then started blanking out some of her posts and left. Surprised when she showed up again.

.