Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here's some science behind your attraction to T-Girls.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by greep View Post
    I think when these psychiatrists labelled homosexuality as a mental illness, they are addressing the fact that homosexuality is counter intuitive to humans inborn need to reproduce and carry on the species --thus being gay is not normal and is an illness (according them).

    For psychiatrists, anyways, religion has nothing to do with it.





    .
    You won't find more than a grain of sand worth of credible psychiatrists in Canada today calling non-hetro orientations a "mental illness". LGBT people may have mental illnesses for other reasons (as do all parts of society), however that does not connect to their sexual orientation.The only ones that will say that for the most part are ones that are highly committed to christian dogma and kept that with them as they built their careers. And if religous dogma forms your scientific opinions, then you are not credible as a medical professional.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Shyla Wild View Post
      Holy shit!!! You are back! Happy new year!

      By the way, doctors and medical professionals can be religious. no matter how hypocritical thats sounds....
      Thanks Shyla, never really left, just lurk now.

      I stay out of trouble this way, hehehe................
      I am Greep, hear me roar

      Comment


      • #33
        very informative thanks for taking the time to share

        Comment


        • #34
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phallic_woman

          besides freud said feet resembles penis and that's why people like feet

          wonder why so many men like girl's feet? they like the phallus-like of the girl

          woman with a phallus is very hot, and straight men can fuck them same as woman with vagina, the problem would be if phallic girls wouldn't have any hole and they couldn't be fucked, there's not much difference between fucking a girl with a vagina and fucking a girl with a penis, the big difference is the beauty, some shemales look masculine and are unable to have a femenine voice and other stuff

          testosterone changes the body in very big ways, a transgender man that was born female, once he transitions and takes testosterone THERES NO TURNING BACK, it'll be extremely difficult to go back to the before-testosterone stage

          male kids that get castrated or suffered testicular cancer or lose by accident have the same secondary characteristics as females, or most of them
          Last edited by asphyxia; 04-04-2017, 03:44 PM.

          Comment


          • #35
            Wrong, there is a way back. It's called a time machine.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by alex99 View Post
              Wrong, there is a way back. It's called a time machine.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Anji View Post
                Firstly great video, thanks for sharing M. Secondly, JamieGirl, i agree with some things you said but trust me, us women (cis or trans) don't have it equal, and we push that much harder to get to an equal state. Gender inequality is largely a behind-the-scenes issue. Statistics say wage equality is actually getting to the equal state. We're only off by 6% when comparing exactly the same position/careers. But many careers have male-dominated leadership positions especially baby boomer men in upper management/partner positons who want things to stay that way. Many companies are still promoting just enough women to upper management positions to reach status quo. Big corporations are hiring just enough trans people in their forefront operations to say they are a trans-friendly company but are totally against renovating washrooms to become genderneutral. Businesses aim to hit the status quo for equality. Inequality hides behind the PR. Real inequality is male managers taking female associates ideas less seriously because we are women or because we're showing cleavage and that's where their focus is. Or how our husbands expect us to take a longer maternity leaves because their jobs are "more important" than ours. Or how female corporate women have to control their attire/looks to be taken seriously by men. There are times where we're forced to shed femininity and act/look like men to be taken seriously by men but trust me, us women want to embrace our femininity in workplaces too.

                I agree with what you are saying that being feminine is letting the man take the lead, the subtle things like man's hand over a woman's or how a man should approach/ask a woman out. Men want to have women who make them feel more masculine for sure. But also a huge young population of men want to be power couples. In the relationships they want a soft woman, but in our careers, they want a powerful woman, so let's not confuse our career ambition with our personal lives because many of us women are good at managing both sides.

                Also what's wrong with both people taking their time out of their busy days to cook and clean for each other. Both sexes taking turns driving or ordering first. Both sexes taking time to look good for each other. Sounds pretty utopian, no? Since when did women have to do these tasks alone and also be soft women & yet a powerful woman too.

                Back to the main topic though, i think it's safe to say trans-popularity has risen a lot due to the internet. I mean most men first get exposure to transwomen through the internet and the transwomen are usually a sort of sex worker or else are models. I mean seriously how many men here even know transwomen who aren't some type of sex workers... I dont think men like transwomen because cis-women are getting too masculine, i definitely think there's a big sex-driven influence/correlation here. Anyways don't know enough about biology or about their data they based their research off of to agree or disagree with the video, i just wanted to talk about women's equality still not being fully there and how it sometimes seems like men still have a problem with women taking dominant social roles in their careers.
                Men and women are not the same. Gender is NOT a social construct. Certain components are influenced by society but the foundation of gender is biological. Consequently, perfect equality is an impossibility. However, equitability, such as equal rights, under society is certainly possible.


                JamieGirl hit the nail on the head, modern society is rendering the traditional roles obsolete. The issue is that members of both genders still biologically identify with those roles. Biological evolution has not kept pace with the evolution of society. It is arguably more palatable for females because they are net gainers whereas males are net losers. Mazlow's hierarchy of needs states that humans ultimately need an opportunity to have self-esteem and for self-actualization. If the average man is not permitted (by society) to identify with his basic nature then do not expect him to readily participate in it. Many feminists do not seem to get this, or want to get this. Men who attempt to voice their (objective) opinions are labelled misogynists or are said to be mansplaining.

                Part of the appeal of trans women to me is their overt embracing of femininity. They are trying to be female where (more fanatical) feminists are trying to be male (hyperbole for effect). I still find cis women attractive but in today's social climate I approach potential relationships with caution because of this ambiguity of roles.

                It is rather ironic that the study found that women (in general) are still attracted to 'alpha males' yet many left-leaning opinions use that term as a derogatory-term.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Referring back to the video, men need to know that they are not gay for loving trans girls because that perceived 'gayness' (if that's a word) would affect their alpha-male identity and, therefore, their ability to attract the opposite sex.
                  Originally posted by justvisiting2016 View Post
                  I have made peace with myself and I dont need to really know "why"... I enjoy something so I do it. I may be in the minority here but I really wish men would stop worrying so much about "why" or "am I gay" or "I am straight damnit and this is why".... why need to fit into boxes and labels other than worrying what other people think? If a friend or family member in your life craps on you for it, minimize their time in your life and be with people who love you for who you are.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by asphyxia View Post
                    woman with a phallus is very hot, and straight men can fuck them same as woman with vagina, the problem would be if phallic girls wouldn't have any hole and they couldn't be fucked, there's not much difference between fucking a girl with a vagina and fucking a girl with a penis
                    >"shemales without a butthole cannot be fucked"<(). There is wet head docking wet head sex with a phallic girl, i'd rather call that 2 heads fucking with no pushing head within foreskin, just outer sex fucking completely out an'rubbin tipy tips wetty heady heads ta cum, call it same genitalia fucking. Fucking does not only mean penetration, 2 females can fuck without using a dildo, 2 shemales can fuck without using any penetration as well....TO SUM UP the science as to why guys are attracted to tgirls is simple: because we are finding the pretty and sensuous to be what they are, pretty and sensuous therefore sexually appealing. GOOGLE- sensuous- being sexually appealling or pleasing to the senses.
                    Last edited by dom r; 04-17-2017, 06:31 PM.

                    Comment



                    Working...
                    X