Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Racists

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    a must read

    URGENT ATTENTION About Our OAS pensions Bill C-428 An Act to Amend the Old Age Security Act (residency requirements)





    And the insanity continues .................

    Bill C-428 will allow recent immigrants to apply for OAS in 3 years instead of the existing 10 years!!!





    This bill had first reading in the house on June 18, 2009. IT WAS SECONDED BY BOB RAE!! (Booby Rae is still finding ways to spread our money all over the place). MP Ms Ruby Dhalla who introduced the bill represents the riding of Brampton whose population is mainly East Indian. Right now you have to have lived in Canada for 10 years in order to qualify for Old Age Security. She wants the time reduced to 3 years! Thousands could come to Canada when they are 62 years old ..... never having worked or contributed to this county's tax system etc, ........... and qualify for full Old Age Security benefits in 3 years! 10 years minimum is reasonable. THREE (3) is NOT!

    I have looked this up and you can too. Google C-428 and you will see this bill has only one purpose, to featherbed a select group of people for votes.

    I certainly hope this bill does not get passed. It is about time we called our elected MP's to ask them to NOT support this bill. Their response may be one factor in helping us determine who gets elected in the next election.

    What Can You Do?

    1. Spread the message to family, friends and e-mail buds.

    2. Write letters , send e-mails to all your list, and call or contact Members of Parliament

    It is time Canada looked after it's Vets and long-term citizens before inventing ways to toss OUR hard-earned money around on people who have no right to this money, never having paid taxes or contributed to our economy. If a family wishes to bring elderly relatives here .... and are willing to waive their own right to collect these funds in order that the elderly relatives can receive them ... fine ... otherwise .... look after them yourself and do not expect the Canadian taxpayers to do it.







    There are too many people legally and illegally abusing the generosity of the Canadian people. We need to stop the madness....NOW!






    We, our children and our grandchildren currently owe the global investment community over $500 Billion Dollars, the sum of our accumulated National Debt that is never publicised.

    CANADIAN VALUES MONITOR

    PLEASE FORWARD
    HMMMMMM now we know where are tax dollers are being spent
    SEMI-RETIRED 519-209-3058

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Admin
      No i am saying the power and wealth has been in the hands of european settlers in the US because they were the majority of the population for hundreds of years.
      Elected offiicals are suspiously of european descent because they have been the majority of population for hundreds of years.

      I am not arguing whether they oppressed anyone or not. I am just saying they have controlled the wealth and power from the beginning. So, yes it would be a long time before immigrants would get into the higher paying jobs etc. However because people of european descent have held the wealth so long it is pretty obvious that they can afford to send their children to school easier etc.
      They pass their wealth down to their children.
      The people with the money donate it to support their own causes such as political parties.

      Some, not all, blacks were brought to America as slaves that's a fact.
      The fact is they had no wealth until hundreds of years later and they did not have citizen status,
      they were considered chattel. They were still a very small percentage of the population regardless.
      Now anyone can have citizen status and things are changing faster every day.

      It takes time for things to change.
      Majority has always ruled minority, why should this be any different?
      Wealth has always ruled poverty.

      Is it a coincidence that the mexicans speak spanish?
      No, the wealth was controlled there by the Spanish for years.
      Did they opress the Mexican nationals, yes.
      Show me a ruling majority in history that didn't opress someone somehow.
      Show me a country in the world that has fully beaten this sort of structure.
      Probably Canada and the USA are the closest of any country.
      But it takes time.
      The Romans once opressed the Christians, now the Roman Catholic church is one of the biggest religious sects in the world.

      I would say by 2800AD everyone will be pretty much the same.
      White and black probably won't even exist.
      Most of the world is Chinese and Indian.

      This is all simple political ideas.
      People discuss this shit in University classes all the time without getting their panties in a knot.

      I also never said the original posting wasn't racist.
      However it is not actually the words of Ray and I have gotten that email like 75 times.
      So there is no reason we can't discuss it.
      I wouldn't be encouraging Ray to post similar things but here it is.


      Did u know the Dutch were one of the wealthiest nations back then......
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYwPimYdCK8
      Well said
      Feels REALLY GOOD to read a bit of WISDOM here on tgirlforums...

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by tslisaparadise View Post
        URGENT ATTENTION About Our OAS pensions Bill C-428 An Act to Amend the Old Age Security Act (residency requirements)





        And the insanity continues .................

        Bill C-428 will allow recent immigrants to apply for OAS in 3 years instead of the existing 10 years!!!





        This bill had first reading in the house on June 18, 2009. IT WAS SECONDED BY BOB RAE!! (Booby Rae is still finding ways to spread our money all over the place). MP Ms Ruby Dhalla who introduced the bill represents the riding of Brampton whose population is mainly East Indian. Right now you have to have lived in Canada for 10 years in order to qualify for Old Age Security. She wants the time reduced to 3 years! Thousands could come to Canada when they are 62 years old ..... never having worked or contributed to this county's tax system etc, ........... and qualify for full Old Age Security benefits in 3 years! 10 years minimum is reasonable. THREE (3) is NOT!

        I have looked this up and you can too. Google C-428 and you will see this bill has only one purpose, to featherbed a select group of people for votes.

        I certainly hope this bill does not get passed. It is about time we called our elected MP's to ask them to NOT support this bill. Their response may be one factor in helping us determine who gets elected in the next election.

        What Can You Do?

        1. Spread the message to family, friends and e-mail buds.

        2. Write letters , send e-mails to all your list, and call or contact Members of Parliament

        It is time Canada looked after it's Vets and long-term citizens before inventing ways to toss OUR hard-earned money around on people who have no right to this money, never having paid taxes or contributed to our economy. If a family wishes to bring elderly relatives here .... and are willing to waive their own right to collect these funds in order that the elderly relatives can receive them ... fine ... otherwise .... look after them yourself and do not expect the Canadian taxpayers to do it.







        There are too many people legally and illegally abusing the generosity of the Canadian people. We need to stop the madness....NOW!






        We, our children and our grandchildren currently owe the global investment community over $500 Billion Dollars, the sum of our accumulated National Debt that is never publicised.

        CANADIAN VALUES MONITOR

        PLEASE FORWARD
        HMMMMMM now we know where are tax dollers are being spent

        LMAO, id rather see that money help elders (even if they only have been here for 3 years) than see it go into the hands of the bloody queen, lol... trust me they do worst things than that bill with our tax money

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Ray View Post
          Thought this might be of interest to some:


          This is great. I have been wondering about why Whites are racists, and no other race is.....

          Proud to be White


          Michael Richards makes his point...................


          Michael Richards better known as Kramer from TVs Seinfeld does make a good point.


          This was his defense speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act. He makes some very interesting points...


          Someone finally said it. How many are actually paying attention to this? There areAfrican Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans,Arab Americans, etc.


          And then there are just Americans. You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' 'Honkey,' 'Whitey,' 'Caveman'.... and that's OK..


          But when I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink .. You call me a racist.

          You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you... so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?


          You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day.


          You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day.


          You have Yom Hashoah. You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.

          You have the NAACP. You have BET.... If we had WET (White Entertainment Television), we'd be racists. If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.


          If we had White History Month, we'd be racists.

          If we had any organization for only whites to 'advance' OUR lives, we'd be racists.

          We have an Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce. Wonder who pays for that??


          A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.

          If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships... You know we'd be racists.


          There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US ... Yet if there were 'White colleges', that would be a racist college.

          In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists..

          You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.

          You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.

          I am proud.... But you call me a racist.

          Why is it that only whites can be racists??

          There is nothing improper about this e-mail.. Let's see which of you are proud enough to send it on. I sadly don't think many will. That's why we have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS in this country. We won't stand up for ourselves!


          BE PROUD TO BE WHITE!

          It's not a crime YET... but getting very close!


          LOL, my thouhgts are: you're as delusional as Richards is, lol.... this sounds exactly like someone who cant think further than his nose... only whites can be called racist; awwww, we should all sympathize with u Ray, LOL (LMAO @ united negro funds, black history month, bet and all them middle school comments) if u could think for yourself a minute, you'd notice that all those RACIST orgs (according to u, lol) didnt existed a 100 years ago, but they exist now because racism has diminished since then...

          and yea, can u explain me how white people have lost most of their rights (that was the best one, lol)

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by hung&tight View Post
            LMAO, id rather see that money help elders (even if they only have been here for 3 years) than see it go into the hands of the bloody queen, lol... trust me they do worst things than that bill with our tax money
            not fucking likely,why should my tax dollers go to some packy who just came in my country and never paid a fucking dime fuck that fuckin assholes
            SEMI-RETIRED 519-209-3058

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Ray View Post
              Thought this might be of interest to some:
              Michael Richards better known as Kramer from TVs Seinfeld does make a good point.
              well, first, most of it does not come from him. Read Snopes.com

              This was his defense speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act. He makes some very interesting points...

              He never made it to court, he was never charged.
              http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/proudwhite.asp


              Someone finally said it. How many are actually paying attention to this? There areAfrican Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans,Arab Americans, etc.

              That's normal. You got the same thing in Canada. You even have French Canadians and English Canadians. People tend to regroup themselves along common traits, race&ethnic origins are often one.

              And then there are just Americans. You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' 'Honkey,' 'Whitey,' 'Caveman'.... and that's OK..
              It's not ok, it never happenned to me while I was in the US, it never happenned to me in Montreal, or in Toronto.
              If we talk gangsta rap, that's another matter.

              But when I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink .. You call me a racist.

              Same as the other part above.

              You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you... so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?

              Political statement. It serves a cause for a minority in a country to declare themselves abused by the majority, be it reality of perceived reality.

              You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day.

              Given that higher education is hard to access for many black students who happen to be poorer than the rest of the population, it's not a bad thing to have UNCF. There a gazillions of funds like this in US and Canada for various groupes of people. You got college fund for people coming out of high school and studying business admin, ingeenering, etc. You got university funds for people attending insurance related programs, you got some for people from a specific region, you got tons of this really. Having one specifically for poor blacks isn't bad, especially if it helps them stay out of poverty, move out of the ghetto and avoid gangs.

              As for Martin Luther King Day, well, it mostly concerns blacks given the track record of the man... but, how is this racist? AFAIK, the 4th of July celebrates the birth of America, the 1st of July celebrates the birth of Canada, and I can't remember any of these people being black. Is the 1st July only for white, french and english speaking Canadians?

              You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day.

              And various US states will have various days wich, afaik, are not official day off.
              There is a Women's day, there is now a "Monday with no meat", as a carnivorous man, should I be offended?

              You have Yom Hashoah. You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.

              Again with the above. Tons of special days. I once had a Catholic calendar, and I can't remember having one day that wasn't a religious day. Is this wrong? Should Protestants feel threathened by Catholics because they have a day to Celebrate St-Andrew?

              You have the NAACP. You have BET.... If we had WET (White Entertainment Television), we'd be racists. If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.
              The second one is pure marketing. You know, minority&all? There is no "Muslim entertainment channel" in Tunisia. But you'll find channels wich aim their programming at French people. Just as you'll find in Canada television for many cultures (check your cable listing)
              The first one, is again, related to the minority status, where people try to reach higher than where they are.
              If you had a White Pride Day where you want the Whites to be in control of the country and above any other "race", yes, that would be racist. Excluding people and treating them as second class citizens because of religion, color or language spoken is just wrong.

              If we had White History Month, we'd be racists.

              Being the majority in a country really sucks. So, black people want to celebrate popular black historical figures. I don't really mind...

              If we had any organization for only whites to 'advance' OUR lives, we'd be racists.

              There's the Tea Party...

              We have an Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce. Wonder who pays for that??

              The members of these chambers? Like all other chambers?

              A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.

              40 years ago it was relevant. Now, it should be abandonned, imho, but I fail to see the harm in there when you know how it came to be (no blacks allowed in Miss America pageant at first, then very few blacks selected).

              Let's stir up the shit a little (sorry): There's a thread stickied on this forum, 2010 T-Women weekly. There's only transexual women in there. Is that a discrimination against other women? Should there also be men because it's gender discriminate?
              hmm...

              If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships... You know we'd be racists.

              Possibly. Then again, there are multiple college funds that will be aimed at just about any group.

              There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US ... Yet if there were 'White colleges', that would be a racist college.

              Black Colleges are titles inherited from the time where blacks could not attend "College" as it was forbidden by law, even though it wasn't called "White College". These colleges are open to whites, hispanics, green and pinks (well, maybe not pinks depending where it is...)

              In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists..

              Depends on your point of view. If you march to get equal rights to other people in your country, is this wrong?
              If you march to get privileges that would set you as a ruling class over other groups, is this wrong?
              In other words, is Gay Pride the same as the Nuremberg rallies?
              I don't think so, but I'm willing to argue.

              You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.

              because, mostly it's not the same. You can be proud of being white, but what does that mean? I'm proud of being French-Canadian and speaking my language in a country that's been historically hostile to us. If I was in a wheelchair and I won a race against other people in a wheelchair, I'd be proud. If, standing on my two legs as I am I'd won a race against people in wheelchairs, I don't think I could derive any pride in that.

              Of course, there are black racists. In the US and in Canada.

              You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.

              of course. And if it's a gay man, they are homophobic. If it's a Qu?b?cois in the USA arrested for importing drugs, it's a innocent victim of an elaborate plot against the poor French who didn't understand english as good as he should.
              Minorities tend to stick together, and there's always a specific lobby for them, and lobbies are vocals. When a lazy worker gets fired in a shop, the Union defends him/her. When a black gets arrested/killed, his lobby will defend him.


              I am proud.... But you call me a racist.
              It always depend on what you are proud of. Proud of being what you are, proud of your origins? Proud of your culture, your language? I see nothing wrong about that. But White Pride as a different meaning, and when you look at people who call themselves "Proud to be white", it's usually proud of Apartheid.

              Why is it that only whites can be racists??

              No, whites aren't the only ones racists, far from it. But we get the finger mostly pointed at us because we are the majority in the US and Canada, even if among us we are many minorities combined.

              I have no pride of being white, it means nothing to me. I'm proud of being Canadian when Sidney Crosby scores the "gold" goal
              I'm proud when I accomplish something I didn't think possible in my case or very hard to do. Proud of being born with a color of skin instead of another, that's just not for me.

              Comment


              • #37


                Seriously though, I'm a white male, 5th gen Canadian of Scottish/Danish/German extraction. I can't really get behind Richards or the OP because, as has been pointed out before in this thread, us white guys still have it pretty fucking good.

                With all the advantages I got from being raised as a WASP upper middle class guy, I think I'm OK with not being able to use the n-word.
                I got soul...and I'm super bad!

                WWJBD- What would James Brown do?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by faze2 View Post
                  z*^

                  seriously though, i'm a white male, 5th gen canadian of scottish/danish/german extraction. I can't really get behind richards or the op because, as has been pointed out before in this thread, us white guys still have it pretty fucking good.

                  With all the advantages i got from being raised as a wasp upper middle class guy, i think i'm ok with not being able to use the n-word. :d
                  wasp?
                  SEMI-RETIRED 519-209-3058

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by tslisaparadise View Post
                    wasp?
                    White Anglo-Saxon Protestant

                    in other words, non-catholic British or Scottish descent.

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_A...xon_Protestant
                    I got soul...and I'm super bad!

                    WWJBD- What would James Brown do?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Chris Rock had a joke about Race in America. After a show he had just done, he was in the Theater and there was an older one-eyed, one-armed White guy sweeping up the ground. He asked the guy if he would trade places with him and the White guy said no. He wanted to "ride this White thing out". Chris was amazed that someone faced with the choice of being famous would turn it down and, as Rock said, "I'm RICH!". Whenever a White guy does something wrong, it's just one guy. When a Black guy does something wrong, we ALL get painted with the same brush. I've felt myself in the 90's with the L.A. riots and O.J. Simpson so I can tell you: White America is in NO danger of losing their standing as #1.
                      "Not You, Garlic Naan Bread!"

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        it is to my understanding that racism can only be rooted from people who have a position of power. it's for most forms of oppression. there's a structure called the Triangle of Oppression that illustrates how individual thoughts, actions and institutional collaborate to construct stereotypes and ideas of how minorities work.
                        do I personally think that other races can be racist against "whites", yes only because based upon my understanding to have the position of power, in North America, there are many people of many races who have power.
                        Click Here to see all of me on Shemale Yum

                        Comment



                        Working...
                        X