Who is This?

[toban]

My last thought on this thread!

None of us has the right to tell anyone that they can not call themselves "whatever" until the government sets out licensing standards for the right to use the appelation TGirl in the same way as they do for Dr, dentist, lawyer, Chiropractor, plumber, electrician etc. etc.

Until then it has to be open season on use of that term by anyone and everyone, including the designation "Real"!

[sensual_lover20]

Re: Who is This?

Alyssa, yes you can place whatever phrases you like in your own title, but then please don't try to deny others the very same right! Each person has the same right as do you, to call themselves what they want to call themselves. The clients in the marketplace will determine who they wish to associate with. What you call yourself will not cause anyone to immediately pick up the phone to call. We are generally drawn by the visual attraction of a girl, by her appearance and her eroticism and we are not attracted simply by a word or a phrase!

Also, why do you limit DISCRIMINATION to only race or skin color? Why shouldn't it be extended to all "girls" in the community, despite whether they have progressed a lot or a little, or perhaps they have not yet progressed at all, in changing their appearance as a female.

How can you make the decision to admit someone to the "REAL" community? - should it include 3 months hormones, 2 laser sessions plus 1 corrective facial surgery, or should it be even more restrictive to exclude the use of wigs and/or padded bras - or demand that all hormone therapy be completed first? Would "natural" breasts be more acceptable than implants? Does lack of breasts mean exclusion from the "REAL CLUB". Will a waist "nip" count more than an "adams apple reduction"? How would dental work be calculated in this plan?

So you can see that there will have to be a set of rules established if "REAL" becomes a criteria. This will be impossible to accomplish without discriminating against someone on some technicality. It just can not be done. Call yourself what you like, but leave the others alone to do their thing - after all they have rights too.

Can't we all just get along here! I think we were all expressing our differences and we all have a right to our opinions....................Anybody has the right to put what they like on their tittle freedom of expression as long as it is not hurtful or directed towards another person by the race or color of their skin. PEACE TO ALL! ALYSSA

I personally feel that the reason why the use the term "real" is because of the effort they put into their transformation. In my preference, I will not have any sexual relations with anything other than girls who put their efforts into their transformation. If a guy just slaps on make up, I won't touch it and I know because I tried it once. Now I ask t-girls when I see them if it's full time or part time. I have nothing against any others but as you say it is all how you feel. If they feel like "real" transexuals then so be it. I don't think they are. You might not need implants, but an effort with hormones is a minimum. If you were truly confused with your gender, or the one which was assigned to you, then you would be making almost all efforts to revert back. With that respect, I would call post ops females, not shemales anymore. I have experimented with men before also, and I cannot even get hard. Therefore as most people on the forum we are attracted to t-girls for their FEMININITY on genetic girls. A guy with no hormones or surgeries is unlikely to appear very feminine, but ultimately you can tell they are guys when their clothes are off. That's what doesn't attract me. But when this girl with a great curvy body pops out a woody, I don't have to think twice because I am already mentally convinced. But that is just me personally. What defines "real" though is extremely opinionated, so you cannot say someone is wrong for it. For example, designer wallets can be conceived as real or fake also, but this is limited to their features such as interior, exterior and overall quality of design. Some may inspect it as a fake, and some may inspect it as a real wallet. As for the definition of transexual it is defineds as:

transexual

noun
1. a person who has undergone a sex change operation [syn: transsexual] - which I think is female
2. a person whose sexual identification is entirely with the opposite sex [syn: transsexual] - where Toban wins in his argument

As I said before though, you can identify yourself as a women on any grounds but I don't think it makes you one. If I decide to wake up one morning and realize that I want to be a women, can I just wear my clothes as usual and say I feel like a butch women? Call me a school teacher, but I wouldn't give myself an A for effort there. The girls who are convinced that they are women, should strive to be like one through hormones at a minimum, surgeries if necessary. But when you don't put that effort, you diminish yourself by not reaching your full feminine potential and are holding back. That state is usually a CD. In my opinion, to be real is making that effort, not just identifying with the opposite sex. Rebuttal me if you want, but I am only stating what the other girls were trying to state. Overall, I don't dislike CD's, but if your a CD, don't call yourself a TG when all these girls pump the time and effort into transforming themselves which I have a lot of respect for. My two cents.

I think you are confused and as nice as you appear to be I just couldn't read the whole post because I got stuck here

If a guy just slaps on make up, I won't touch it

Now I know your english is just fine so I know that wasn't a mistake.


You sound like the male shemale police......I think you would find yourself alone in the shemale fan world where most guys aren't as rude or picky as you. There wouldn't be any shemale porn or anything if it was for guys like you.


Also please don't think that most guys think like you....because most guys would love that angel from the first pictures.....and they sure as hell wouldn't call her "it".

Just because I throw some slang in my speech, doesn't make me any different. Besides, most guys are like me. I really don't care what you say. There is a reason why tons of people rush to see Lucy, because she looks the most feminine and why they are not running to any CD's. Those who like shemales go USUALLY for the most feminine. Maybe some are not as picky as me, but it doesn't make either of us right or wrong as it is personal preference. I like shemales, so without me there wouldn't be any shemale porn. As much as you bash my arguments, yours are also fallacious and non sequitor. Also, I never mentioned anything about Angel so lets not put words in my mouth. Ergo, I never could have called her "it". But please do read my entire banter before trashing me, it would be well appreciated.

[Modulus]

Re: Who is This?

Alyssa, yes you can place whatever phrases you like in your own title, but then please don't try to deny others the very same right! Each person has the same right as do you, to call themselves what they want to call themselves. The clients in the marketplace will determine who they wish to associate with. What you call yourself will not cause anyone to immediately pick up the phone to call. We are generally drawn by the visual attraction of a girl, by her appearance and her eroticism and we are not attracted simply by a word or a phrase!

Also, why do you limit DISCRIMINATION to only race or skin color? Why shouldn't it be extended to all "girls" in the community, despite whether they have progressed a lot or a little, or perhaps they have not yet progressed at all, in changing their appearance as a female.

How can you make the decision to admit someone to the "REAL" community? - should it include 3 months hormones, 2 laser sessions plus 1 corrective facial surgery, or should it be even more restrictive to exclude the use of wigs and/or padded bras - or demand that all hormone therapy be completed first? Would "natural" breasts be more acceptable than implants? Does lack of breasts mean exclusion from the "REAL CLUB". Will a waist "nip" count more than an "adams apple reduction"? How would dental work be calculated in this plan?

So you can see that there will have to be a set of rules established if "REAL" becomes a criteria. This will be impossible to accomplish without discriminating against someone on some technicality. It just can not be done. Call yourself what you like, but leave the others alone to do their thing - after all they have rights too.

Can't we all just get along here! I think we were all expressing our differences and we all have a right to our opinions....................Anybody has the right to put what they like on their tittle freedom of expression as long as it is not hurtful or directed towards another person by the race or color of their skin. PEACE TO ALL! ALYSSA

I personally feel that the reason why the use the term "real" is because of the effort they put into their transformation. In my preference, I will not have any sexual relations with anything other than girls who put their efforts into their transformation. If a guy just slaps on make up, I won't touch it and I know because I tried it once. Now I ask t-girls when I see them if it's full time or part time. I have nothing against any others but as you say it is all how you feel. If they feel like "real" transexuals then so be it. I don't think they are. You might not need implants, but an effort with hormones is a minimum. If you were truly confused with your gender, or the one which was assigned to you, then you would be making almost all efforts to revert back. With that respect, I would call post ops females, not shemales anymore. I have experimented with men before also, and I cannot even get hard. Therefore as most people on the forum we are attracted to t-girls for their FEMININITY on genetic girls. A guy with no hormones or surgeries is unlikely to appear very feminine, but ultimately you can tell they are guys when their clothes are off. That's what doesn't attract me. But when this girl with a great curvy body pops out a woody, I don't have to think twice because I am already mentally convinced. But that is just me personally. What defines "real" though is extremely opinionated, so you cannot say someone is wrong for it. For example, designer wallets can be conceived as real or fake also, but this is limited to their features such as interior, exterior and overall quality of design. Some may inspect it as a fake, and some may inspect it as a real wallet. As for the definition of transexual it is defineds as:

transexual

noun
1. a person who has undergone a sex change operation [syn: transsexual] - which I think is female
2. a person whose sexual identification is entirely with the opposite sex [syn: transsexual] - where Toban wins in his argument

As I said before though, you can identify yourself as a women on any grounds but I don't think it makes you one. If I decide to wake up one morning and realize that I want to be a women, can I just wear my clothes as usual and say I feel like a butch women? Call me a school teacher, but I wouldn't give myself an A for effort there. The girls who are convinced that they are women, should strive to be like one through hormones at a minimum, surgeries if necessary. But when you don't put that effort, you diminish yourself by not reaching your full feminine potential and are holding back. That state is usually a CD. In my opinion, to be real is making that effort, not just identifying with the opposite sex. Rebuttal me if you want, but I am only stating what the other girls were trying to state. Overall, I don't dislike CD's, but if your a CD, don't call yourself a TG when all these girls pump the time and effort into transforming themselves which I have a lot of respect for. My two cents.

I think you are confused and as nice as you appear to be I just couldn't read the whole post because I got stuck here

If a guy just slaps on make up, I won't touch it

Now I know your english is just fine so I know that wasn't a mistake.


You sound like the male shemale police......I think you would find yourself alone in the shemale fan world where most guys aren't as rude or picky as you. There wouldn't be any shemale porn or anything if it was for guys like you.


Also please don't think that most guys think like you....because most guys would love that angel from the first pictures.....and they sure as hell wouldn't call her "it".

Just because I throw some slang in my speech, doesn't make me any different. Besides, most guys are like me. I really don't care what you say. There is a reason why tons of people rush to see Lucy, because she looks the most feminine and why they are not running to any CD's. Those who like shemales go USUALLY for the most feminine. Maybe some are not as picky as me, but it doesn't make either of us right or wrong as it is personal preference. I like shemales, so without me there wouldn't be any shemale porn. As much as you bash my arguments, yours are also fallacious and non sequitor. Also, I never mentioned anything about Angel so lets not put words in my mouth. Ergo, I never could have called her "it". But please do read my entire banter before trashing me, it would be well appreciated.

did you use the word it or not? What is this topic about? So you basically condone people going around putting others down? I think you live in your own little world and you are a poor spokesman with little experience. How do you know people don't run to see CD's?

Who exactly are you in this buisness that have such vast knowledge about who sees who and what guys like?


Just to get back to "it" you used the word....you didn't care and you knew exactly what you were doing.....you are just as hateful as the girls and trust me more than one person saw your post and they weren't exactly impressed


I think....you think too highly of yourself.....I think guys like you are the reason why my so called "CD" members are afriad to post....so much negativity except for people that you find acceptable. Lame dude...very lame.

[sensual_lover20]

Re: My last thought on this thread!

None of us has the right to tell anyone that they can not call themselves "whatever" until the government sets out licensing standards for the right to use the appelation TGirl in the same way as they do for Dr, dentist, lawyer, Chiropractor, plumber, electrician etc. etc.

Until then it has to be open season on use of that term by anyone and everyone, including the designation "Real"!

Good point. I still define "real" from my point of view, whether it be wrong or right. Therefore, I think today I feel like a women, so I must be confused with my gender since I am actually a male. I guess today I am transexual then since you can always revert back without consequences. I think I am "real" today so I guess I am. Many would argue with me that I am not a women, but since I choose to classify myself that way then I guess I am. If this is the case then you can become a mental t-girl in an instant and there are tons of t-girls out there than I surely thought. Now, seeing as how I don't have implants, if a guy did the onlooker would say one is more passable/convincing than the other. This is almost synonymous with the word real, but not quite. I think we are fighting different battles here Toban. I am just a picky guy and you are not as picky in the t-girl world. We look at "real" in different lights [I do agree with you that none of us has the right to tell anyone that they can not call themselves "whatever", but I am talking physically] so let's agree to disagree.

[sensual_lover20]

Re: Who is This?

Alyssa, yes you can place whatever phrases you like in your own title, but then please don't try to deny others the very same right! Each person has the same right as do you, to call themselves what they want to call themselves. The clients in the marketplace will determine who they wish to associate with. What you call yourself will not cause anyone to immediately pick up the phone to call. We are generally drawn by the visual attraction of a girl, by her appearance and her eroticism and we are not attracted simply by a word or a phrase!

Also, why do you limit DISCRIMINATION to only race or skin color? Why shouldn't it be extended to all "girls" in the community, despite whether they have progressed a lot or a little, or perhaps they have not yet progressed at all, in changing their appearance as a female.

How can you make the decision to admit someone to the "REAL" community? - should it include 3 months hormones, 2 laser sessions plus 1 corrective facial surgery, or should it be even more restrictive to exclude the use of wigs and/or padded bras - or demand that all hormone therapy be completed first? Would "natural" breasts be more acceptable than implants? Does lack of breasts mean exclusion from the "REAL CLUB". Will a waist "nip" count more than an "adams apple reduction"? How would dental work be calculated in this plan?

So you can see that there will have to be a set of rules established if "REAL" becomes a criteria. This will be impossible to accomplish without discriminating against someone on some technicality. It just can not be done. Call yourself what you like, but leave the others alone to do their thing - after all they have rights too.

Can't we all just get along here! I think we were all expressing our differences and we all have a right to our opinions....................Anybody has the right to put what they like on their tittle freedom of expression as long as it is not hurtful or directed towards another person by the race or color of their skin. PEACE TO ALL! ALYSSA

I personally feel that the reason why the use the term "real" is because of the effort they put into their transformation. In my preference, I will not have any sexual relations with anything other than girls who put their efforts into their transformation. If a guy just slaps on make up, I won't touch it and I know because I tried it once. Now I ask t-girls when I see them if it's full time or part time. I have nothing against any others but as you say it is all how you feel. If they feel like "real" transexuals then so be it. I don't think they are. You might not need implants, but an effort with hormones is a minimum. If you were truly confused with your gender, or the one which was assigned to you, then you would be making almost all efforts to revert back. With that respect, I would call post ops females, not shemales anymore. I have experimented with men before also, and I cannot even get hard. Therefore as most people on the forum we are attracted to t-girls for their FEMININITY on genetic girls. A guy with no hormones or surgeries is unlikely to appear very feminine, but ultimately you can tell they are guys when their clothes are off. That's what doesn't attract me. But when this girl with a great curvy body pops out a woody, I don't have to think twice because I am already mentally convinced. But that is just me personally. What defines "real" though is extremely opinionated, so you cannot say someone is wrong for it. For example, designer wallets can be conceived as real or fake also, but this is limited to their features such as interior, exterior and overall quality of design. Some may inspect it as a fake, and some may inspect it as a real wallet. As for the definition of transexual it is defineds as:

transexual

noun
1. a person who has undergone a sex change operation [syn: transsexual] - which I think is female
2. a person whose sexual identification is entirely with the opposite sex [syn: transsexual] - where Toban wins in his argument

As I said before though, you can identify yourself as a women on any grounds but I don't think it makes you one. If I decide to wake up one morning and realize that I want to be a women, can I just wear my clothes as usual and say I feel like a butch women? Call me a school teacher, but I wouldn't give myself an A for effort there. The girls who are convinced that they are women, should strive to be like one through hormones at a minimum, surgeries if necessary. But when you don't put that effort, you diminish yourself by not reaching your full feminine potential and are holding back. That state is usually a CD. In my opinion, to be real is making that effort, not just identifying with the opposite sex. Rebuttal me if you want, but I am only stating what the other girls were trying to state. Overall, I don't dislike CD's, but if your a CD, don't call yourself a TG when all these girls pump the time and effort into transforming themselves which I have a lot of respect for. My two cents.

I think you are confused and as nice as you appear to be I just couldn't read the whole post because I got stuck here

If a guy just slaps on make up, I won't touch it

Now I know your english is just fine so I know that wasn't a mistake.


You sound like the male shemale police......I think you would find yourself alone in the shemale fan world where most guys aren't as rude or picky as you. There wouldn't be any shemale porn or anything if it was for guys like you.


Also please don't think that most guys think like you....because most guys would love that angel from the first pictures.....and they sure as hell wouldn't call her "it".

Just because I throw some slang in my speech, doesn't make me any different. Besides, most guys are like me. I really don't care what you say. There is a reason why tons of people rush to see Lucy, because she looks the most feminine and why they are not running to any CD's. Those who like shemales go USUALLY for the most feminine. Maybe some are not as picky as me, but it doesn't make either of us right or wrong as it is personal preference. I like shemales, so without me there wouldn't be any shemale porn. As much as you bash my arguments, yours are also fallacious and non sequitor. Also, I never mentioned anything about Angel so lets not put words in my mouth. Ergo, I never could have called her "it". But please do read my entire banter before trashing me, it would be well appreciated.

did you use the word it or not? What is this topic about? So you basically condone people going around putting others down? I think you live in your own little world and you are a poor spokesman with little experience. How do you know people don't run to see CD's?

Who exactly are you in this buisness that have such vast knowledge about who sees who and what guys like?


Just to get back to "it" you used the word....you didn't care and you knew exactly what you were doing.....you are just as hateful as the girls and trust me more than one person saw your post and they weren't exactly impressed


I think....you think too highly of yourself.....I think guys like you are the reason why my so called "CD" members are afriad to post....so much negativity except for people that you find acceptable. Lame dude...very lame.

Clearly I used the word "it". The topic was originally about who a person is, until some stated they are a CD and then the topic shifted off from that. This is an opinion forum, I condone anyone's opinion's whether negative or positive. Unless, the negative is against the primary objective of the forum which is to support these special groups. Negative can be used in a sense to say a girl has bad services, or is ugly and there is nothing wrong with that. I don't quite have the experience as you do as I am new to this community. I am still etitled to my own opinion though. Guys can do and so whoever they want, I don't care. I am stating I would not have sexual relations with a CD. I am not bashing them. They should also classify themselves as CD if they are really one, not a TG. I am not as negative as you think, I am on this forum which extends my love to a special group are girls. Many in society do not accept them, but I do. I am a bit more acceptable than you think. In fact, I have met CD's before and I am nice to them, not negative. I am very supportive of letting people do what they want actually. I don't care if you are impressed with my words or not. El fin!

[Ana]

Re: Who is This?

What I find most laughable about this situation is that this girl that everyone is obviously questiong her status from a pic at the beginning of her transition... Who the f**k gave you the right to sit there and dictate who is and who is that bla bla bla....? NO ONE... STFU and let the guys sit back and enjoy what they were trying to enjoy SHEMALE PORN.... Seriously some of you girls honestly make me sick... She is not a fucking TRANSSEXUAL because she has not gone through all these surgeries and etc etc....? WTF do you honestly think you popped out of your mothers woumb and had TRANSSEXUAL branded on your ass cheek and was given a gift certificate for surgeries and a perscription for hormones? The funny thing is this girl right here looks better than 99.9% than of any of you did at the beginning of your transition... Why dont you ladies stop trying to calling it like you see it because obviously some of us dont know shit... BTW I think Angel Star deserves some props for not trying to scurry away and hide from herself by changeing her name 5 million times like alot of you girls did...

Lexi

P.S... Take away all the silicone surgeries and implants and hormones and really what is all of our exteriors girls..? Were not the fucking Clark Institute here...

[Modulus]

Re: Who is This?

Clearly I used the word "it". The topic was originally about who a person is, until some stated they are a CD and then the topic shifted off from that. This is an opinion forum, I condone anyone's opinion's whether negative or positive. Unless, the negative is against the primary objective of the forum which is to support these special groups. Negative can be used in a sense to say a girl has bad services, or is ugly and there is nothing wrong with that. I don't quite have the experience as you do as I am new to this community. I am still etitled to my own opinion though. Guys can do and so whoever they want, I don't care. I am stating I would not have sexual relations with a CD. I am not bashing them. They should also classify themselves as CD if they are really one, not a TG. I am not as negative as you think, I am on this forum which extends my love to a special group are girls. Many in society do not accept them, but I do. I am a bit more acceptable than you think. In fact, I have met CD's before and I am nice to them, not negative. I am very supportive of letting people do what they want actually. I don't care if you are impressed with my words or not. El fin!

You got no right to be calling anyone in on my site.....I don't care who you are or what you think.....this isn't a public forum....you sign up and choose to be part of this online community.....there are rules posted.....don't be a dick for no reason. You are not entitled to be a dick here.....you want to go to goodhandys and be a dick do it there or you want to go on the street and be negative.....that's your choice but don't call people "it" and post your negative thoughts here. There are people who won't even post because they are afraid of people just like you calling them "it" or making them out to be a freak.

I mean if that makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside.....cool, but go do it somewhere else.....and take all the girls who think that is ok with you.

[Modulus]

Re: Who is This?

What I find most laughable about this situation is that this girl that everyone is obviously questiong her status from a pic at the beginning of her transition... Who the f**k gave you the right to sit there and dictate who is and who is that bla bla bla....? NO ONE... STFU and let the guys sit back and enjoy what they were trying to enjoy SHEMALE PORN.... Seriously some of you girls honestly make me sick... She is not a fucking TRANSSEXUAL because she has not gone through all these surgeries and etc etc....? WTF do you honestly think you popped out of your mothers woumb and had TRANSSEXUAL branded on your ass cheek and was given a gift certificate for surgeries and a perscription for hormones? The funny thing is this girl right here looks better than 99.9% than of any of you did at the beginning of your transition... Why dont you ladies stop trying to calling it like you see it because obviously some of us dont know shit... BTW I think Angel Star deserves some props for not trying to scurry away and hide from herself by changeing her name 5 million times like alot of you girls did...

Lexi

P.S... Take away all the silicone surgeries and implants and hormones and really what is all of our exteriors girls..? Were not the fucking Clark Institute here...

Like the only girl with a common sense

[toban]

Re: Who is This?

I am now going to break my word and post once more!

Lexi, you got that right! Exactly the point I have been trying to make!

[Ana]

Re: Who is This?

Things get lost in translation, but in all honesty I think alot of these girls get lost in transition and forget where they come from...

Lexi

[lisa]

Re: Who is This?

Seriously some of you girls honestly make me sick... She is not a fucking TRANSSEXUAL because she has not gone through all these surgeries and etc etc....? WTF do you honestly think you popped out of your mothers woumb and had TRANSSEXUAL branded on your ass cheek and was given a gift certificate for surgeries and a perscription for hormones? WTF, all my life i thought it was a birthmark, son of a bitch..... lexi youve been checkin out my ass again havent ya lol

[Modulus]

Re: Who is This?

Well i wasn't talking about you Lisa.
You a pretty accepting person.

i think she is quoting lexi on the page before

[lisa]

Re: Who is This?

Well i wasn't talking about you Lisa.
You a pretty accepting person.

yes i am, i love everything pretty and shiny, black white big and small, oh ya speeking of big can i have that dildo from the other day i got alittlebit intimate with it and im sure its calling my name lol and for the record yes craig you and admin have done so much for me over the past 3 years and i wish i could make it up to you guys one day,for me the only advertising i do is here in the forum and shemalecanada and your other site the safesextour and i only hope in the near future we will all try and behave in a mature manner and make toronto ts the best in the world

[cherry]

Re: Who is This?

fuck man its a dead link ?

[Ozzpuppet]

Food for Thought

Here are some more links of Angel, and you can visibly tell her transition. Just goes to show that you can't judge a book by its cover.
A few things dwelling on my mind also:
Who has the right to say she is a CD/TV just by one link? Does that one link make her a gay guy or does it prove that she desires to be feminine?
I think we should let the actress/actor say that one.

http://www.ladyboy-shemale.com/ultim...rl/angel-star/
http://www.tenmilliongalleries.com/f...ml?ferroc93200
http://www.tenmilliongalleries.com/f...ml?ferroc93200
http://www.ladyboy-shemale.com/shema...ll/angel-star/
http://www.tenmilliongalleries.com/f...ml?ferroc93200
http://www.tenmilliongalleries.com/f...ml?ferroc93200
http://picgalleries.hotshemalesluts....vets/tour1.htm
http://movgalleries.hotshemalesluts....vets/tour1.htm
http://www.shemantics.com/ws74/wskok...28&tour=random
http://www.shemantics.com/ws74/wsepo...28&tour=random
http://movgalleries.hotshemalesluts....vets/tour1.htm
http://www.shemantics.com/st_movies/...28&tour=random
http://iloveshemale.com/galleries/wo...d_jean/1391054
http://gallys.asstoyedshemales.com/v...UzOjI6Mg,0,0,0,
http://gallys.shemalesgetfucked.com/...UzOjI6Mw,0,0,0,
http://gallys.shemalesgetfucked.com/...UzOjI6Mw,0,0,0,

http://hosted.trannypay.com/gulpers/004/gall01.php
http://hosted.trannypay.com/champs/002/gall01.php
Also, with the trannypay.com websites, if you change the three digit number, such as 002 to 003, you can scroll through the different models, and as well as getting different clips by changing the gall number, such as gall01 to gall05, all the way up to gall10.
I hope I was helpful here.